Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40384648›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025

Enhancing the accuracy of genioplasty using mixed reality and computer-aided design/manufacturing: a randomized controlled trial.

Kotaro Tachizawa, Keisuke Sugahara, Masahide Koyachi, Kento Odaka, Satoru Matsunaga, Maki Sugimoto, Akira Katakura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kotaro TachizawaDepartment of Oral Pathobiological Science and Surgery, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1537-5620
Keisuke SugaharaDepartment of Oral Pathobiological Science and Surgery, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo, Japan.
Masahide KoyachiDepartment of Oral Pathobiological Science and Surgery, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo, Japan.
Kento OdakaOral Health Science Center, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo, Japan.
Satoru MatsunagaOral Health Science Center, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo, Japan.
Maki SugimotoDepartment of Oral Pathobiological Science and Surgery, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo, Japan.
Akira KatakuraDepartment of Oral Pathobiological Science and Surgery, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Genioplasty is performed as part of orthognathic surgery to correct jaw deformities. This procedure presents challenges in terms of osteosynthesis accuracy. This study aimed to evaluate the precision of preoperative planning in genioplasty using computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) with three-dimensional (3D) printable biomaterials and mixed reality (MR) technology with a head-mounted display (Microsoft Methods: Twenty-six patients underwent genioplasty using either only CAD/CAM devices (control group, n=10) or CAD/CAM with additional MR technology (experimental group, n=16). CAD/CAM devices were created based on virtual surgical planning (VSP), and MR holograms created based on VSP data were projected onto the surgical area using Microsoft HoloLens 2. After surgery, the planned model was compared with the postoperative computed tomography (CT) image, measuring the 3D surface and the differences in position and rotation using the root mean square deviation (RMSD) and Bland-Altman's method. Both analyses are blinded. Results: The average 3D surface analysis errors within 2 mm ranged between 62.20-100.00% (control group) and 99.30-100.00% (experimental group), with mean errors of 92.12% and 99.81%, respectively. Errors within 1 mm ranged between 28.50-98.90% (control group) and 55.10-99.6% (experimental group) with mean errors of 67.36% and 85.60%, respectively. The largest RMSDs were 1.20 mm in the anteroposterior direction and 6.78° in pitch orientation for the experimental group and 1.78 mm in the anteroposterior direction and 6.04° in pitch orientation for the control group. A statistically significant difference between the two groups was observed for errors measured within 1 mm (P=0.047) and for yaw (P=0.003). No postoperative complications were observed in either group. Conclusions: Using CAD/CAM with additional MR technology in genioplasty improved the repositioning accuracy of the chin bone fragment and plate placement, with statistically significant improvements in specific spatial directions. This combination of CAD/CAM and MR technology allows for intraoperative spatial verification of fragment movement according to preoperative VSP, which significantly contributes surgical precision.

Indexed as

Computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM)genioplastymixed reality (MR)three-dimensional analysis (3D analysis)three-dimensional printing (3D printing)

Identifiers

PMID40384648
PMCPMC12082582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.