Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40384638›Full record

ArticleClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2025

FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Essentials: A Guide to Understanding, Applying, and Interpreting Adverse Event Data Reported to FAERS.

Emeri Potter, Melissa Reyes, Jennifer Naples, Gerald Dal Pan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Regulatory, clinical, and post-marketing challenges of lecanemab for Alzheimer's disease: insights from real-world data.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emeri Potter *Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-2237-060X
Melissa Reyes *Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7131-7166
Jennifer NaplesOffice of Surveillance and Epidemiology, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7797-0150
Gerald Dal PanOffice of Surveillance and Epidemiology, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4874-5864

Funding

Intramural FDA HHS FD999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) performs safety assessments throughout the life cycle of a drug. Postmarketing safety surveillance promotes the identification of adverse events not known at the time of approval. Adverse event reports, also called individual case safety reports (ICSRs), submitted to FDA, are collected and stored in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). ICSRs stored in FAERS may be reviewed-along with multiple other data sources-to detect potential safety signals and to perform a thorough evaluation to determine if a causal association exists between a drug and an adverse event. Although FAERS is a powerful tool for drug safety surveillance and assessment, understanding the content, application, and proper interpretation of the data contained in FAERS is necessary to reach scientifically and medically accurate conclusions and contextualize findings. This article aims to highlight considerations and explain fundamental concepts of FAERS to promote accurate analyses and appropriate interpretation of the data available.

Indexed as

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsProduct Surveillance, PostmarketingUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationHumansUnited States

Identifiers

PMID40384638
PMCPMC12393772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.