Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40384631›Full record

ReviewBrain and behavior2025

When Silence Breaks: The Influence of Pure Tones and White Noises on Conditioned Flight Responses.

Sebastiano Francesco Matarazzo di Licosa, Andrea Stefano Moro, Mattia Ferro, Antonio Malgaroli, Jacopo Lamanna

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Tail-rattling in rodents: more than a threat display.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sebastiano Francesco Matarazzo di LicosaCenter for Behavioral Neuroscience and Communication (BNC), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Andrea Stefano MoroCenter for Behavioral Neuroscience and Communication (BNC), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Mattia FerroCenter for Behavioral Neuroscience and Communication (BNC), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Antonio MalgaroliCenter for Behavioral Neuroscience and Communication (BNC), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Jacopo LamannaCenter for Behavioral Neuroscience and Communication (BNC), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1919-8219

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe flight response is part of the repertoire of adaptive behavioral responses all animals possess and use to face threats coming from their environment. Compared to the other responses, flight requires a high degree of physical effort and is thought to be related to those active coping strategies that can be observed in several psychopathological conditions, including anxiety and depressive disorders. In recent years, a new protocol of auditory fear conditioning has been shown to induce a learned flight response in mice, based on a conditioned stimulus that includes pure tones and white noise, the serial compound stimulus (SCS).

methodsIn this review, we examine the effects of stimulus characteristics in fear learning paradigms, particularly in the context of the recently developed SCS paradigm. We will discuss how factors such as conditioned stimulus (CS) modality (e.g., tone versus white noise), stimulus salience, and the temporal relationship between stimuli influence conditioned flight responses.

resultsFor the study of both physiological and maladaptive behaviors, fear conditioning still represents the paradigm of choice, e.g., for the modeling of psychiatric conditions such as post-traumatic stress disorder or phobias. Albeit its relevance in this context, up to now only a few studies have focused on developing procedures for eliciting conditioned flight responses in the laboratory, in favor of freezing/immobilization, the so-called fright response. The SCS protocol poses new interesting questions on the impact of noises and other stimuli on learning and behavioral responses.

conclusionThe discovery of SCS already led to interesting findings in the neurobiology of fear learning and shows great potential for the study of maladaptive responses in animal models of psychopathology.

Indexed as

Conditioning, ClassicalFearNoiseAcoustic StimulationAnimalsHumansMiceanimal behaviorfear conditioningPavlovian learningSCSsensory systemsserial compound stimuluswhite noise

Identifiers

PMID40384631
PMCPMC12086516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.