ReviewProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2025
Experimental methods for studying amyloid cross-interactions.
Review in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeting soluble misfolded oligomers in anti-amyloid research.Nature reviews. Chemistry · 2026Review
- Bioinformatic assessment of the potential amyloidogenicity of the human and evolutionarily more ancient proteomes.The Biochemical journal · 2026Article
- Amyloid Cross-Interactions through the Lens of Simulations: The Case of Aβ-IAPP.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2025Article
- Experimental methods for studying amyloid cross-interactions.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Interactions between amyloid proteins represent the cornerstone of various pathogenic pathways, including prion conversion and co-development of distinct kinds of systemic amyloidosis. Various experimental methodologies provide insights into the effects of such cross-interactions on amyloid self-assembly, which range from acceleration to complete inhibition. Here, we present a comprehensive review of experimental methods most commonly used to study amyloid cross-interactions both in vitro and in vivo, such as fluorescence-based techniques, high-resolution imaging, and spectroscopic methods. Although each method provides distinct information on amyloid interactions, we highlight that no method can fully capture the complexity of this process. In order to achieve an exhaustive portrayal, it is necessary to employ a hybrid strategy combining different experimental techniques. A core set of fluorescence methods (e.g., thioflavin T) and high-resolution imaging techniques (e.g., atomic force microscopy or Cryo-EM) are required to verify the lack of self-assembly or alterations in fibril morphology. At the same time, immuno-electron microscopy, mass spectrometry, or solid-state NMR can confirm the presence of heterotypic fibrils.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.