Trial reportJournal of oral rehabilitation2025
Comparative Efficacy of Digital 3D-Printed and Conventional Stable Occlusal Splints in the Treatment of Temporomandibular Disorders.
Trial report in Journal of oral rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fully digital workflow versus conventional methods for fabricating the Michigan appliance in patients with temporomandibular joint disorder. A randomized controlled clinical trial.BMC oral health · 2026Trial
- Application of fully digital occlusal splints in painful temporomandibular disorders: a randomized controlled clinical study.Head & face medicine · 2026Trial
- A machine learning approach to predict treatment response in myofascial pain patients receiving masseter trigger point injections.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Accuracy and Reproducibility of Digital Vertical Dimension Increase in Occlusal Splint Design: A Comparative In Vitro Study of Three CAD Software Systems.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Behavioral Dentistry in the Digital Age: A Review of Biofeedback Occlusal Splint Therapy.Cureus · 2026Review
- Review
- Perceptions of Individuals/Patients with Temporomandibular Disorders About Their Diagnosis, Information Seeking and Treatment Expectations: A Comparative Qualitative Study of Brazilian and Spanish Individuals.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTemporomandibular disorders (TMD) are a group of diseases that affect the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), masticatory muscles and associated structures.
objectiveThis present study aims to explore the clinical comparative efficacy of digital 3D-printed and conventional handmade stable occlusal splints in the treatment of TMD and provide evidence for clinical promotion.
methodsA total of 130 patients diagnosed with TMD using the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) were recruited and randomly assigned to two groups. One group received conventional handmade occlusal splints, while the other group received digital 3D-printed splints. The treatment efficacy, craniomandibular index scores and splint fabrication time were compared between the two groups at follow-up.
resultsThe findings indicated that digital 3D-printed stable occlusal splints offered comparable efficacy and satisfaction levels to traditional stabilisation splints while significantly cutting down on production time and enhancing overall efficiency. This study demonstrated that the use of fully digital technology, including digital intraoral scanning, virtual adjustments, computer-aided design and 3D printing, in fabricating occlusal splints for TMD patients not only maintained therapeutic effectiveness but also streamlined the production process.
conclusionsDigital 3D-printed stable occlusal splints can not only alleviate TMD symptoms as effectively and satisfactorily as the conventional handmade stable splint, but also reduce production time and improve accuracy and efficiency, promising good clinical application prospects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.