ReviewJournal of evidence-based medicine2025
Large Language Models in Integrative Medicine: Progress, Challenges, and Opportunities.
Review in Journal of evidence-based medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Application of Large Language Models in Chronic Disease Care: Mixed Methods Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Diagnostic accuracy of large language models for emergency department triage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Beyond transparency: why Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) need explainable artificial intelligence (XAI).Chinese medicine · 2026Review
- Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus as a Multisystem Disease: From Insulin Resistance to Organ Crosstalk-A Narrative Review.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Tuning and clinical application of large language models in Traditional Chinese Medicine: scoping review.Chinese medicine · 2026Review
- A national survey on how to improve the integration of traditional Chinese medicine and artificial intelligence: Attitudes and perceptions from medical staff.Integrative medicine research · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in acupuncture: bridging traditional knowledge and precision integrative medicine.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Integrating Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) and Modern Medicine faces significant barriers, including the absence of unified frameworks and standardized diagnostic criteria. While Large Language Models (LLMs) in Medicine hold transformative potential to bridge these gaps, their application in integrative medicine remains underexplored and methodologically fragmented. This review systematically examines LLMs' development, deployment, and challenges in harmonizing Modern and TCM practices while identifying actionable strategies to advance this emerging field. This review aimed to provide insight into the following aspects. First, it summarized the existing LLMs in the General Domain, Modern Medicine, and TCM from the perspective of their model structures, number of parameters and domain-specific training data. We highlighted the limitations of existing LLMs in integrative medicine tasks through benchmark experiments and the unique applications of LLMs in Integrative Medicine. We discussed the challenges during the development and proposed possible solutions to mitigate them. This review synthesizes technical insights with practical clinical considerations, providing a roadmap for leveraging LLMs to bridge TCM's empirical wisdom with modern medical systems. These AI-driven synergies could redefine personalized care, optimize therapeutic outcomes, and establish new standards for holistic healthcare innovation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.