Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40384496›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical entomology2025

Tick spotting: using mannequins to evaluate individual efficacy at detecting Ixodes scapularis (Acari: Ixodidae).

Tela Zembsch, David Jansen, Xia Lee, Emily Oberle, Rosemary Philip, Lyric Bartholomay, Susan Paskewitz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical entomology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Why are the ticks winning, and what can we do about it?Ticks and tick-borne diseases · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tela ZembschMidwest Center of Excellence for Vector-Borne Disease, Madison, WI, USA.
David JansenMidwest Center of Excellence for Vector-Borne Disease, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5857-0581
Xia LeeMidwest Center of Excellence for Vector-Borne Disease, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9248-3940
Emily OberleMidwest Center of Excellence for Vector-Borne Disease, Madison, WI, USA.
Rosemary PhilipMidwest Center of Excellence for Vector-Borne Disease, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-3719-8801
Lyric BartholomayMidwest Center of Excellence for Vector-Borne Disease, Madison, WI, USA.
Susan PaskewitzMidwest Center of Excellence for Vector-Borne Disease, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7180-7392

Funding

ACL HHS U01CK000651Centers of Disease Control and Prevention 1U01CK000651NCEZID CDC HHS U01 CK000651
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tick checks are a free and accessible personal protection measure used to prevent tick bites and are frequently recommended by public health institutions and vector-borne disease researchers. However, little is known about how successful people are at detecting ticks on themselves or others when using this method. We developed a tool for evaluating factors affecting the efficacy of tick checks using mannequins. In 2022 and 2023, we recruited 207 participants to complete a brief survey and perform a tick check on a mannequin, where dead Ixodes scapularis Say larvae, nymphs, and adults had been glued at various locations. None of the survey results (demographics, knowledge, attitude, and concerns about ticks and tick-borne disease) were associated with likelihood of tick detection. On average, participants detected 42% of nymphs on the mannequin. Adult females were 3 to 4 times more likely to be detected than nymphs. Ticks above the waistline were detected 3 times more frequently than ticks below. Ticks that were on white-colored clothing were 3 times more likely to be detected than those on dark-colored clothing. Ticks that were not covered by hair or clothing were 2 times more likely to be detected than covered ticks. These findings show that there are multiple factors that may limit tick detection during a tick check. Outreach should emphasize the importance of awareness of size variation between stages, completing a thorough whole-body examination including the lower limbs and covered locations, and wearing light-colored clothing.

Indexed as

IxodesManikinsTick ControlAdultAnimalsFemaleHumansLarvaMaleMiddle AgedNymphYoung Adultblacklegged tickpreventionsurveytick check

Identifiers

PMID40384496
PMCPMC12754835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.