ReviewThe New phytologist2026
The promise of digital herbarium specimens in large-scale phenology research.
Review in The New phytologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Seasonal Drought Timing Shapes Flowering Phenology Directly and Through Biotic Interactions.Ecology letters · 2026Article
- Herbarium specimens reveal drivers of Arctic shrub growth.The New phytologist · 2026Article
- Digitised herbarium specimen data reveal a climate change-related trend to an earlier, shorter Canadian Arctic flowering season, and phylogenetic signal in Arctic flowering times.The New phytologist · 2026Article
- Using herbarium collections to study genetic responses to global change.The New phytologist · 2026Review
- The data archiving in the small herbaria digitisation workflow.Biodiversity data journal · 2026Article
- Retrospective phenology in western Mediterranean plants: revealing climate change patterns through herbarium specimens.AoB PLANTS · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The online mobilization of herbaria has made tens of millions of specimens digitally available, revolutionizing investigations of phenology and plant responses to climate change. We identify two main themes associated with this growing body of research and highlight a selection of recent publications exemplifying: investigating phenology at large spatial and temporal scales and in understudied locations and testing long-standing theories and novel questions in ecology and evolution that were not previously answerable. We explore strengths and limitations of using digitized herbarium specimens in phenology research, including: issues of sampling; reliability, transferability, and biases; and ethical and social justice considerations. This field will see further breakthroughs as herbaria around the world continue to mobilize and digitally interlink their collections. New developments will likely come from advances in technology, international collaborations, and including understudied plant taxa and regions such as the Arctic and the tropics. Advances in technology are already improving digitization workflows and speeding the collection of phenology data from digital specimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.