ArticleRenal failure2025
The combination of left ventricular ejection fraction and end-diastolic diameter and outcomes in peritoneal dialysis patients: a multicenter retrospective study.
Article in Renal failure, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Alterations in endothelial activation biomarkers ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 following mitral regurgitation surgery.Turkish journal of surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is often complicated by left ventricular dysfunction, which is associated with a poor prognosis. This study aims to investigate the association between baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) plus left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) with outcomes in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. In this multicenter retrospective study, 1,511 incident Chinese patients on PD between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2021 were enrolled. Restricted cubic splines (RCS) were used to explore the non-linear associations between LVEF+LVEDD and the risk of mortality. Parametric models for interval-censored survival-time data (stintreg) were used to examine the association between LVEF+LVEDD quartiles and the outcomes. During 6,451.11 person-years of follow-up [median 4.81 (IQR 3.61-6.81) years], 247 (17.8%) patients died, including 88 cardiovascular deaths. RCS showed a U-shaped association between LVEF+LVEDD and the risks of all-cause and CV mortality. According to the quartiles, the optimal range of LVEF+LVEDD associated with the lowest risk of all-cause and CV mortality was 103-107, which was set as the reference range. Both higher (≥115) and lower (<103) levels of LVEF+LVEDD were associated with increased risks of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 2.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.58-3.07; HR 1.68, 95% CI 1.19-2.36) and cardiovascular mortality (HR 2.51, 95% CI 1.33-4.75; HR 1.86, 95% CI 0.96-3.61). Low and high levels of baseline LVEF+LVEDD were associated with increased risks of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in PD patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.