SynthesisTropical medicine & international health : TM & IH2025
Prevalence and determinants of modern contraception use among persons with disabilities in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prevalence and determinants of modern contraception use among persons with disabilities in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH · 2025Pooled it
- Disability and sexual and reproductive health outcomes among women in Cambodia: a cross-sectional analysis of the 2021-22 demographic and health survey.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPeople with disabilities have the same need for contraception as the general population. However, their access to modern contraceptive methods is largely underexplored in low- and middle-income countries.
objectiveThis study aimed to explore the prevalence of modern contraception use among reproductive-aged (15-49 years) persons with disabilities in low- and middle-income countries and identify the key determinants.
methodsIn June 2024, we conducted a systematic search across six databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Global Health, Medline and Scopus to identify studies on disability and modern contraception in low- and middle-income countries. The search terms included a combination of Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms and keywords related to disability, modern contraception and low- and middle-income countries integrated using the Boolean operators (AND, OR). All studies published between January 2015 and June 2024, in English, and conducted in low- and middle-income countries were included. The primary outcomes were the prevalence of modern contraception use and its determinants among persons with any disability. Summary estimates were calculated using meta-analysis with a fixed effects model for lower heterogeneity. Random effects meta-analysis was used for mid-level heterogeneity (50%-74%) and high-level heterogeneity (75%-100%).
resultsA total of 18 studies from low- and middle-income countries were included, with 11 included in the meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of modern contraception use among persons with disabilities was 31.4% (95% CI: 26.5, 36.2). Significant heterogeneity was observed across respondent characteristics (I
conclusionThis study reveals a significantly lower prevalence of modern contraception use among persons with disabilities in low- and middle-income countries compared to the general population. Improving access to education, addressing social norms and strengthening healthcare systems may contribute to increasing access to contraception and uptake among persons with disabilities in low- and middle-income countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.