ReviewRomanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie
Gestational trophoblastic diseases - literature review and atypical case reports.
Review in Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gestational choriocarcinoma following an ectopic pregnancy: A diagnostic dilemma in low-resource settings.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
- Gestational Trophoblastic Disease: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Updates in Light of Recent Evidence: A Literature Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD) arises from the abnormal development of trophoblastic tissue and encompasses a wide range of benign and malignant conditions. There is evidence that malignant transformation can occur in atypical areas of the placenta. A complete diagnosis of GTD involves assessing the signs and symptoms, with the most common being vaginal bleeding and pelvic-abdominal pain, alongside laboratory data and variations in human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) levels. Imaging exploration, both local and distant, is critical for assessing tumor areas, utilizing various techniques such as ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography (PET)-CT. Furthermore, a detailed histopathological analysis is essential, which includes classical examination with Hematoxylin-Eosin (HE) staining to highlight the presence of abnormal villi or transformed trophoblasts. Immunohistochemical staining with antibodies like anti-cytokeratin 7 (CK7) marks tumor cells with trophoblastic origin, while anti-p57 is present in incomplete hydatidiform moles (HMs) and absent in complete HMs (CHMs). The tumor proliferation index, obtained by calculating the density of tumor cells undergoing division and immunolabeled with the anti-Ki67 antibody, along with the invasion into the myometrial structure among myocytes immunolabeled with anti-alpha-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) antibody, helps establish a definitive diagnosis and classify GTD. Diagnosis remains a challenge even among expert gynecologists and pathologists. This study has gathered data from literature and analyzed the evolution of a series of atypical cases and the management strategies related to the diagnosis and therapeutic opportunities of GTD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.