ArticleStatistics in medicine2025
UNITED: A Unified Transparent and Efficient Phase I/II Trial Design for Dose Optimization Accounting for Ordinal Graded, Continuous and Mixed Toxicity and Efficacy Endpoints.
Article in Statistics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- A robust Bayesian dose optimization design with backfill and randomization for phase I/II clinical trials.Statistical methods in medical research · 2025Article
- Seamless Phase I-II Cancer Clinical Trials Using Kernel-Based Covariate Similarity.Pharmaceutical statisticsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A primary objective of oncology dose-finding trials for novel therapies is to determine an optimal biological dose (OBD) that is both tolerable and therapeutically beneficial for patients in subsequent clinical trials. These new therapeutic agents are more likely to induce multiple low- or moderate-grade toxicities rather than dose-limiting toxicities. Additionally, efficacy is evaluated comprehensively, differentiating between complete remission and partial remission, as well as incorporating continuous efficacy endpoints. This important issue was highlighted in the American Statistical Association (ASA) Biopharmaceutical (BIOP) Section open forums and was a significant consideration of the FDA's "Project Optimus." We proposed the UNITED design, a unified, transparent, and efficient Phase I/II trial design to incorporate toxicity and efficacy grades and types, as well as continuous efficacy responses, into dose-finding and optimization. The UNITED design can handle binary, quasi-binary, continuous, and mixed toxicity and efficacy endpoints. We further extended the UNITED design, referred to as TITE-UNITED, to accommodate delayed toxicity and efficacy outcomes. Simulation studies showed that the UNITED and TITE-UNITED designs have desirable operating characteristics, performing comparably to or better than existing designs. A user-friendly software is available for practical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.