Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40384080›Full record

ReviewAnatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007)2026

Shaping the human face: Periosteal bone modeling across ontogeny.

Sarah E Freidline, Madison Hubbart, Catherine Shipman, Najielie Burgos, Chiara Villa, Alexandra Schuh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Shaping the human face: Periosteal bone modeling across ontogeny.Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sarah E FreidlineDepartment of Anthropology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4872-4924
Madison HubbartDepartment of Anthropology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA.
Catherine ShipmanDepartment of Anthropology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA.
Najielie BurgosDepartment of Anthropology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA.
Chiara VillaDepartment of Forensic Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Alexandra SchuhDepartment of Human Origins, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Facial morphology is a defining aspect of Homo sapiens that distinguishes our species from fossil ancestors and plays a central role in estimating age, sex, and ancestry in both past and present populations. Understanding how the face develops during postnatal ontogeny is essential for interpreting adult facial variation. Periosteal bone modeling (i.e., patterns of resorption and formation) provides direct evidence of bone growth activity underlying morphological variation. This study quantifies periosteal bone modeling in a cross-sectional ontogenetic sample of individuals ranging from birth to adulthood from three geographical populations: Western Europe, Greenland, and South Africa. Epoxy replicas were analyzed using digital microscopy to quantify bone resorption, and digital maps of the bone modeling patterns were created for each facial region-brow ridge, zygomatic, maxilla, and mandible-and projected onto three-dimensional surface models. In parallel, geometric morphometric and multivariate statistical analyses were used to evaluate ontogenetic patterns. Results highlight a consistent sequence of resorption and deposition during human ontogeny and a strong pattern of covariation between bone modeling and shape for most facial regions. The face is largely resorptive from early ontogeny, with deposition increasing with age; the maxilla is significantly more resorptive than other facial regions. Greater resorption in the midface corresponds to significant facial growth and development in early ontogeny, and a developmental shift around adolescence marks the transition from primarily downward to more forward-oriented growth. Overall, the combined approach underscores the developmental coordination of the face and suggests that the human facial growth pattern reflects the need to maintain a non-projecting face from birth on.

Indexed as

FaceFacial BonesPeriosteumAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleYoung Adultbone modelingbone resorptiongeometric morphometricsgrowth and developmenthuman evolution

Identifiers

PMID40384080
PMCPMC12803535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.