Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40384077›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2025

Improved Machine Learning Predictions of EC50s Using Uncertainty Estimation from Dose-Response Data.

Hugo Bellamy, Joachim Dickhaut, Ross D King

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hugo BellamyDepartment of Chemical engineering and biotechnology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TN, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-8358-8078
Joachim DickhautBASF, Ludwigshafen 67056, Germany.
Ross D KingDepartment of Chemical engineering and biotechnology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TN, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In early-stage drug design, machine learning models often rely on compressed representations of data, where raw experimental results are distilled into a single metric per molecule through curve fitting. This process discards valuable information about the quality of the curve fit. In this study, we incorporated a fit-quality metric into machine learning models to capture the reliability of metrics for individual molecules. Using 40 data sets from PubChem (public) and BASF (private), we demonstrated that including this quality metric can significantly improve predictive performance without additional experiments. Four methods were tested: random forests with parametric bootstrap, weighted random forests, variable output smearing random forests, and weighted support vector regression. When using fit-quality metrics, at least one of these methods led to a statistically significant improvement on 31 of the 40 data sets. In the best case, these methods led to a 22% reduction in the root-mean-squared error of the models. Overall, our results demonstrate that by adapting data processing to account for curve fit quality, we can improve predictive performance across a range of different data sets.

Indexed as

Machine LearningDose-Response Relationship, DrugUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID40384077
PMCPMC12152940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.