ArticleHealthcare informatics research2025
Generative Pre-trained Transformer: Trends, Applications, Strengths and Challenges in Dentistry: A Systematic Review.
Article in Healthcare informatics research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- AI in the Hot Seat: Head-to-Head Comparison of Large Language Models and Cardiologists in Emergency Scenarios.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe integration of large language models (LLMs), particularly those based on the generative pre-trained transformer (GPT) architecture, has begun to revolutionize various fields, including dentistry. Despite these promising applications, the use of GPT in dentistry presents several challenges. Ongoing research and the development of robust ethical frameworks are essential to mitigate these issues and enhance the responsible deployment of GPT technologies in clinical settings. Hence, this systematic review aims to explore the trends, applications, strengths, and challenges associated with the use of GPT in dentistry.
methodsArticles were selected if they contained detailed information on the application of GPT in dentistry. The search strategy used in systematic reviews follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Our search of databases and other sources yielded a total of 704 studies. After removing duplicates and conducting a full-text screening, 16 articles were included in the review. The methodological quality of the research was evaluated using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist.
resultsOut of a total of 91 articles published on GPT in dentistry, 20 were editorials and 11 were narrative reviews; these were excluded, leaving 60 original research articles for further analysis. The articles were assessed based on the type of results they provided. Ultimately, 16 articles that reported positive findings with robust methodology were included in this review.
conclusionsThe results highlight mixed responses; therefore, further research on integration into clinical workflows must be conducted with extensive methodological rigor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.