ArticleTransfusion2025
Urban versus rural blood donors in the United States and the relationship with transfusion-transmissible infections.
Article in Transfusion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionMost US blood donations are from donors living in urban areas. Demographics and infectious disease prevalence may vary in urban versus rural areas. We assessed demographic and transfusion-transmissible infection (TTI) prevalence among donors living in urban versus rural areas.
methodsBlood donation data from the Transfusion-Transmissible Infections Monitoring System were categorized as urban or rural based on donor residential zip code for a three-year period (October 2020-September 2023). Demographics and TTI prevalence (HBV, HCV, HIV consensus positive (CP) and recent infection (RI), and syphilis CP and active infection (ASI)) were compared between the two geographies. Regression analysis determined the odds of TTIs among donors while controlling for demographic characteristics.
resultsFrom 21,941,910 donations, 83.9% were categorized as urban and 16.1% as rural. Donations from urban versus rural donors were more likely to be from men, between the ages of 25 and 54, non-White, and first-time. HBV CP, HIV CP, syphilis CP, and ASI were more prevalent in donations from urban versus rural donors. Significantly higher seroconversion rates also occurred in donors with syphilis CP and ASI. When adjusting for differences in donor demographics and characteristics, only prevalence in HBV CP remained more likely to occur among urban donors (odds ratio (OR): 1.28, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.6) and HCV CP less likely to occur among urban donors (OR: 0.8, 95% CI: 0.71, 0.9). DISCUSSION: Blood donor demographics and TTI prevalence differ in urban areas compared to rural; however, the differences in demographics may explain some of the TTI prevalence trends.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.