ArticleBrain and behavior2025
Cenobamate in Real-Word Scenario: Results on Efficacy, Side Effects, and Retention Rate in a Single Center Retrospective Study.
Article in Brain and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cognitive Effects of Cenobamate as Compared to Perampanel: A Cross-Sectional Multicentre Study in 600 Patients.CNS drugs · 2026Article
- Exploring the Role of Early Add-On Cenobamate in Uncontrolled Focal Epilepsy: A Critical Appraisal of the Evidence.Neurology and therapy · 2026Review
- Sustained seizure reduction, treatment simplification, and high retention with cenobamate: A 12-month real-world study in refractory and ultra-refractory focal epilepsy.Epilepsia open · 2026Article
- The Effects of Cenobamate and Its Dosage on Cognition: A Retrospective Longitudinal Study in 84 Individuals with Epilepsy.CNS drugs · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPharmacoresistance imposes a high burden on people with epilepsy (PWE). Recently authorized cenobamate (CNB) offers new hope with high efficacy reported in phase III and early real-world studies. Here, we present data from a reasonably sized monocentric cohort, complementing the knowledge derived from clinical practice.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed medical records of all PWE treated with CNB from market entry to July 31, 2023.
resultsAfter an average of 1.1 years, follow-up data were available for 262 out of 280 PWE, who received at least one dose of CNB. The average CNB dose was 183 ± 98 mg/d, with a mean number of anti-seizure medications (ASM) of 2.9 ± 1 per patient. A total of 36% of the patients showed ≥ 50% reduction in seizure frequency (10.7% were seizure-free), whilst 12.3% reported increased seizure frequency. Seizure freedom was associated with concomitant perampanel or GABA receptor modulators. No predictors of treatment response were found. Side effects were reported by 38%, alertness issues being most prevalent (19%). The retention rate amounted to 72% and was associated with response status, dose of CNB, side effects, and age at CNB introduction. Among those who discontinued CNB, 55% experienced side effects and 89% showed no meaningful seizure reduction. Regarding co-medication, the withdrawal of lamotrigine, brivaracetam, clobazam, or lacosamide was associated with higher rates of non-response.
conclusionsIn this large cohort of 262 PWE, CNB proved very efficient with a high retention rate over one year. Co-medication with perampanel or GABA receptor modulators was linked to seizure-freedom. The overall positive impression of CNB is further supported.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.