ArticleThe Australian journal of rural health2025
Evaluation of a Hub-And-Spoke Model of Care for the Delivery of Sleep Disorder Services to a Remote Australian Community Using the RE-AIM Framework: A Controlled Before-And-After Implementation Outcome Study.
Article in The Australian journal of rural health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate a Hub-and-Spoke design for providing sleep disorder services in a very remote community. The health service re-design aimed to provide unattended polysomnography at the Spoke site with access to attended laboratory studies at the Hub when clinically indicated.
methodsSummative evaluation using the RE-AIM Framework including all adult patients referred for diagnosis and management of a suspected sleep disorder from Remote Health Service to Metropolitan Health Service 2 years pre-implementation and 1 year post-implementation.
designControlled before-and-after implementation outcome study.
settingPublic hospital in metropolitan South-East Queensland with a comprehensive accredited sleep disorder service (Hub), networked to a Community Health Centre (Spoke), located in a very remote region defined by the Modified Monash Model in central Queensland. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Referral numbers (Reach), travel avoidance and consumer satisfaction (Effectiveness), number of referrers (Adoption), unattended sleep study data quality, timeliness to testing, health service costs (Implementation), and referral numbers beyond initial 12-month pilot (Maintenance).
resultsThe Hub-and-Spoke model increased adoption five-fold by local referrers and resulted in a nine-fold increase in reach. Effectiveness was demonstrated through high levels of consumer satisfaction, and all implementation aims were met, including providing services at a lower cost. Sustainability was demonstrated through ongoing referrals and the transition of the model of care to business as usual.
conclusionHub-and-Spoke designs for public sleep disorder services are effective at both the individual and organisational levels. Services can be delivered at a lower cost and, importantly, improve access to specialist services in remote and very remote communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.