Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40384019›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of psychiatry2025

Stratifying Risk for Postpartum Depression at Time of Hospital Discharge.

Mark A Clapp, Victor M Castro, Pilar Verhaak, Thomas H McCoy, Lydia L Shook, Andrea G Edlow, Roy H Perlis

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07460063 (Routine vs. Early Postpartum Depression Screening), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07460063 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Routine vs. Early Postpartum Depression Screening: A Pragmatic Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMassachusetts General HospitalRan2026 to 2028Enrolled428ConditionsPostpartum Depression (PPD)ArmsEarly PPD Screening
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Building a program to improve postpartum depression screening, triage, and referrals at a large birthing hospital.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mark A ClappDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Clapp, Shook, Edlow) and Center for Quantitative Health and Department of Psychiatry (Castro, Verhaak, McCoy, Perlis), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston; Research Information Science and Computing, Mass General Brigham, Somerville, MA (Castro).ORCID 0000-0001-5568-4444
Victor M CastroDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Clapp, Shook, Edlow) and Center for Quantitative Health and Department of Psychiatry (Castro, Verhaak, McCoy, Perlis), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston; Research Information Science and Computing, Mass General Brigham, Somerville, MA (Castro).
Pilar VerhaakDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Clapp, Shook, Edlow) and Center for Quantitative Health and Department of Psychiatry (Castro, Verhaak, McCoy, Perlis), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston; Research Information Science and Computing, Mass General Brigham, Somerville, MA (Castro).
Thomas H McCoyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Clapp, Shook, Edlow) and Center for Quantitative Health and Department of Psychiatry (Castro, Verhaak, McCoy, Perlis), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston; Research Information Science and Computing, Mass General Brigham, Somerville, MA (Castro).
Lydia L ShookDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Clapp, Shook, Edlow) and Center for Quantitative Health and Department of Psychiatry (Castro, Verhaak, McCoy, Perlis), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston; Research Information Science and Computing, Mass General Brigham, Somerville, MA (Castro).
Andrea G EdlowDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Clapp, Shook, Edlow) and Center for Quantitative Health and Department of Psychiatry (Castro, Verhaak, McCoy, Perlis), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston; Research Information Science and Computing, Mass General Brigham, Somerville, MA (Castro).
Roy H PerlisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Clapp, Shook, Edlow) and Center for Quantitative Health and Department of Psychiatry (Castro, Verhaak, McCoy, Perlis), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston; Research Information Science and Computing, Mass General Brigham, Somerville, MA (Castro).

Funding

Sex Differences in Major Depression, Part II: Impact of Prenatal Immune, Autonomic and Neurovascular FunctionU54MH118919 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Gabriela Apiou · 2020 to 2026
$12.7M
Data-driven subtyping in major depressive disorderR01MH123804 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI PERLIS, ROY H. · 2021 to 2024
$3.1M
Cellular models of fetal neurodevelopment in maternal SARS-CoV-2 infectionRF1MH132336 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI EDLOW, ANDREA GOLDBERG, PERLIS, ROY H. · 2022 to 2022
$2.6M
Sex Differences in Fetal Brain-Placental Immune Programming in Maternal ObesityR01HD100022 · NICHD · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI EDLOW, ANDREA GOLDBERG · 2019 to 2021
$2.0M
1/2 Leveraging electronic health records for pharmacogenomics of psychiatric disordersR01MH116270 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI PERLIS, ROY H. · 2019 to 2022
$1.7M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD100022NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH116270NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH123804NIMH NIH HHS RF1 MH132336NIMH NIH HHS U54 MH118919
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePostpartum depression (PPD) is a major contributor to postpartum morbidity and mortality. Beyond efforts at routine screening, risk stratification models could enable more targeted interventions in settings with limited resources. The authors sought to develop and estimate the performance of a generalizable risk stratification model for PPD in patients without a history of depression, using information collected as part of routine clinical care.

methodsThe authors conducted a retrospective cohort study of all individuals who delivered between 2017 and 2022 in one of two large academic medical centers and six community hospitals. An elastic net model was constructed and externally validated to predict PPD, defined as having a mood disorder, an antidepressant prescription, or a positive screen on the postpartum Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Predictors used included sociodemographic factors, medical history, and prenatal depression screening information, all of which were known before discharge from the delivery hospitalization.

resultsThe cohort included 29,168 individuals; 2,696 (9.2%) met at least one criterion for postpartum depression in the 6 months following delivery. In the external validation data, the model had good discrimination and remained well calibrated: the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.721 (95% CI=0.709, 0.736), and the Brier calibration score was 0.087 (95% CI=0.083, 0.091). At a specificity of 90%, the positive predictive value was 28.8% (95% CI=26.7, 30.8), and the negative predictive value was 92.2% (95% CI=91.8, 92.7).

conclusionsThese findings demonstrate that a simple machine-learning model can be used to stratify the risk for PPD before delivery hospitalization discharge. This tool could help identify patients within a practice at the highest risk and facilitate individualized postpartum care planning for the prevention of, screening for, and management of PPD at the start of the postpartum period and potentially the onset of symptoms.

Indexed as

Depression, PostpartumPatient DischargeAdultFemaleHumansPregnancyRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsDepressive DisordersMood Disorders-PostpartumScreening

Identifiers

PMID40384019
PMCPMC13380851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.