Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40384007›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of sport science2025

Effectiveness of a High-Intensity Interval Games Program in Extra-Curricular Context (MOVI-daFIT!) on Gross Motor Competence and Health-Related Quality of Life in Primary Schoolchildren: Cluster-Randomized Trial.

Antonio Fernández-Sánchez, Mairena Sánchez-López, Abel Ruiz-Hermosa, Andrés Redondo-Tébar, Diana P Pozuelo-Carrascosa, Estela Jiménez-López, Vicente Martínez-Vizcaíno

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of sport science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Antonio Fernández-SánchezSocial and Health Research Center, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Cuenca, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8171-3560
Mairena Sánchez-LópezSocial and Health Research Center, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Cuenca, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0217-0623
Abel Ruiz-HermosaSocial and Health Research Center, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Cuenca, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5127-0591
Andrés Redondo-TébarSocial and Health Research Center, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Cuenca, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5920-6159
Diana P Pozuelo-CarrascosaSocial and Health Research Center, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Cuenca, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0527-5498
Estela Jiménez-LópezSocial and Health Research Center, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Cuenca, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8553-7701
Vicente Martínez-VizcaínoSocial and Health Research Center, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Cuenca, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6121-7893

Funding

Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness-Carlos III Health Institute FIS PI16/01919Research Network on Preventative Activities and Health Promotion RD12/0005/0009Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-intensity interval training (HIIT) has emerged as a time-efficient approach to improve aerobic capacity, cardiovascular health, and cognitive functioning in children and adolescents. However, evidence regarding the impact of school-based HIIT programs on motor competence and health-related quality of life in children is limited. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a HIIT intervention, based on playground games on gross motor competence and health-related quality of life in schoolchildren aged 9-11 years. A cluster-randomized controlled trial was conducted with 562 participants. The intervention involved four weekly 60 min sessions of extracurricular physical activity using traditional games adapted to a HIIT protocol. Gross motor competence and health-related quality of life were assessed using the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-Second Edition (MABC-2) and the KIDSCREEN-27 questionnaire, respectively. Analyzes were conducted on an intention-to-treat basis using mixed linear regression models to compare changes from baseline to postintervention between the intervention and control groups. No significant improvements in gross motor competence or health-related quality of life were observed after adjusting for baseline variables, age, sex, and school. The results suggest that this HIIT-based program was not effective in enhancing gross motor competence or in improving health-related quality of life. Future programs could improve effectiveness by optimizing the balance between movement intensity and quality, aligning activities with gross motor competence assessment tools, emphasizing health-related quality of life components, training educators to enhance quality of life, extending intervention duration to impact self-esteem and psychological well-being, and improving adherence rates.

Indexed as

High-Intensity Interval TrainingMotor SkillsQuality of LifeChildFemaleHumansMaleSchoolshealthmotor skillsphysical activityschool program

Identifiers

PMID40384007
PMCPMC12086302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.