ArticleJournal of proteome research2025
MultiStageSearch: An Iterative Workflow for Unbiased Taxonomic Analysis of Pathogens Using Proteogenomics.
Article in Journal of proteome research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From Identification to Insight: Making Full Use of the Diagnostic Potential of MS/MS Proteotyping in Clinical Microbiology Using Efficient Bioinformatics.Journal of proteome research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The global SARS-CoV-2 pandemic emphasized the need for accurate pathogen diagnostics. While genomics is the gold standard, integrating mass spectrometry-based proteomics offers additional benefits. However, current proteomic and genomic reference databases are often biased toward specific taxa, such as pathogenic strains or model organisms, and proteomic databases are less comprehensive. These biases and gaps can lead to inaccurate identifications. To address these issues, we introduce MultiStageSearch, a multistep database search method that combines proteome and genome databases for taxonomic analysis. Initially, a generalist proteome database is used to infer potential species. Then, MultiStageSearch generates a specialized proteogenomic database for precise identification. This database is preprocessed to filter duplicates and cluster identical open reading frames to reduce genomic database biases. The workflow operates independently of strain-level NCBI taxonomy, enabling the identification of strains not represented in existing taxonomies. We benchmarked the workflow on viral and bacterial samples, demonstrating its superior performance in strain-level taxonomic inference compared to existing methods. MultiStageSearch offers a flexible and accurate approach for pathogen research and diagnostics, overcoming incomplete search spaces and biases inherent in reference databases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.