Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40384001›Full record

ArticleJournal of proteome research2025

MultiStageSearch: An Iterative Workflow for Unbiased Taxonomic Analysis of Pathogens Using Proteogenomics.

Julian Pipart, Tanja Holstein, Lennart Martens, Thilo Muth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of proteome research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Julian PipartData Competence Center MF 2, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin 13353, Germany.
Tanja HolsteinData Competence Center MF 2, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin 13353, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1552-1453
Lennart MartensCompOmics, VIB Center for Medical Biotechnology, VIB, Ghent 9000, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-4277-658X
Thilo MuthData Competence Center MF 2, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin 13353, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8304-2684

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The global SARS-CoV-2 pandemic emphasized the need for accurate pathogen diagnostics. While genomics is the gold standard, integrating mass spectrometry-based proteomics offers additional benefits. However, current proteomic and genomic reference databases are often biased toward specific taxa, such as pathogenic strains or model organisms, and proteomic databases are less comprehensive. These biases and gaps can lead to inaccurate identifications. To address these issues, we introduce MultiStageSearch, a multistep database search method that combines proteome and genome databases for taxonomic analysis. Initially, a generalist proteome database is used to infer potential species. Then, MultiStageSearch generates a specialized proteogenomic database for precise identification. This database is preprocessed to filter duplicates and cluster identical open reading frames to reduce genomic database biases. The workflow operates independently of strain-level NCBI taxonomy, enabling the identification of strains not represented in existing taxonomies. We benchmarked the workflow on viral and bacterial samples, demonstrating its superior performance in strain-level taxonomic inference compared to existing methods. MultiStageSearch offers a flexible and accurate approach for pathogen research and diagnostics, overcoming incomplete search spaces and biases inherent in reference databases.

Indexed as

ProteogenomicsSARS-CoV-2BacteriaCOVID-19Databases, ProteinHumansProteomeProteomicsWorkflowProteome“Norovirus GII”open reading frame (ORF)peptide-spectrum matches (PSMs)Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR)SARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID40384001
PMCPMC12150323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.