ArticleInfant mental health journal2025
Holding dysregulation in mind: How maternal mind-mindedness relates to regulatory symptoms and disorders in infancy.
Article in Infant mental health journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Holding dysregulation in mind: How maternal mind-mindedness relates to regulatory symptoms and disorders in infancy.Infant mental health journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examined the role of maternal mind-mindedness (MM) - the tendency to ascribe mental states to one's child - in infant regulatory symptoms and disorders and the moderating role of parenting stress and global psychological distress. A better understanding of these relationships may inform prevention and intervention programs. The interactional MM measure (appropriate and positive mind-related comments) was applied in a clinical group with regulatory disorders (ClinGrp; N = 124) and a healthy comparison group (CompGrp; N = 31) with mothers and their infants aged 4 to 15 months in Germany. Group differences between the ClinGrp and the CompGrp were calculated. Positive MM was higher in the CompGrp than in the ClinGrp. Appropriate and positive MM were negatively related to infant regulatory symptoms. Psychological distress was negatively linked to appropriate and positive MM. Parenting stress and psychological distress did not moderate the relationship between appropriate MM and regulatory symptoms. Lower-quality MM characterizes parent-infant interactions in the context of regulatory symptoms and disorders. Implications for future research on the valence of mind-minded comments, longitudinal studies on the protective role of MM, possible child effects, and clinical implications are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.