Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40383929›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry letters2025

Bayesian Optimization with Gaussian Processes Assisted by Deep Learning for Material Designs.

Shin Kiyohara, Yu Kumagai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shin KiyoharaInstitute for Materials Research, Tohoku University, 2-1-1 Katahira, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8577, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2890-5760
Yu KumagaiInstitute for Materials Research, Tohoku University, 2-1-1 Katahira, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8577, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0489-8148

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) approaches have become ubiquitous in the search for new materials in recent years. Bayesian optimization (BO) based on Gaussian processes (GPs) has become a widely recognized approach in material exploration. However, feature engineering has critical impacts on the efficiency of GP-based BO, because GPs cannot automatically generate descriptors. To address this limitation, this study applies deep kernel learning (DKL), which combines a neural network with a GP, to BO. The efficiency of the DKL model was comparable to or significantly better than that of a standard GP in a data set of 922 oxide data sets, covering band gaps, ionic dielectric constants, and effective masses of electrons, as well as in experimental data sets, the band gaps of 610 hybrid organic-inorganic perovskite alloys. When searching for the alloy with the highest Curie temperature among 4560 alloys, the standard GP outperformed the DKL model because a strongly correlated descriptor of the Curie temperature could be directly utilized. Additionally, DKL supports transfer learning, which further enhances its efficiency. Thus, we believe that BO based on DKL paves the way for exploring diverse material spaces more effectively than GPs.

Identifiers

PMID40383929
PMCPMC12128098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.