ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2025
Impact of baseline
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Novel therapeutic strategies for metastatic castration‑resistant prostate cancer: Beyond androgen receptor pathway inhibition (Review).International journal of oncology · 2026Review
- Emerging Therapeutic Strategies in Prostate Cancer: Targeted Approaches Using PARP Inhibition, PSMA-Directed Therapy, and Androgen Receptor Blockade with Olaparib, Lutetium (Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis retrospective analysis evaluated the prognostic value of baseline
methodsData from 182 mCRPC patients with baseline
resultsBaseline bone tumor volume prognosticated leukocytopenia (HR 1.03 per 100 ml, p = 0.036), while the number of bone lesions was prognostic for anemia (HR 1.04 per 10 lesions, p < 0.001) and severe anemia (HR per 10 lesions 1.05, p = 0.009). Higher baseline hemoglobin correlated with reduced leukocytopenia (HR 0.74, p = 0.002), thrombocytopenia (HR 0.80, p = 0.033), and severe anemia (HR 0.52, p < 0.001). Baseline kidney dysfunction was linked to anemia (HR 2.46, p = 0.002) and severe anemia (HR 3.81, p = 0.023). Prior [
conclusionBaseline
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.