ArticleScientific reports2025
An ensemble deep learning framework for emotion recognition through wearable devices multi-modal physiological signals.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Channel-Specific Stimulus Sensitivity, Reliability, and Complementarity of Multimodal Wearable Sensing During Short-Form Influencer Video Exposure.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- FCAL-Net: a neural network model for speech emotion recognition of guanzhong dialect with multi-dimensional feature fusion.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Psychological-physical synergy of athletes based on artificial intelligence and deep learning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- HybridSense-LLM: A Structured Multimodal Framework for Large-Language-Model-Based Wellness Prediction from Wearable Sensors with Contextual Self-Reports.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Application of a parametric supermatrix multi-task multimodal deep learning model based on electroencephalogram and peripheral physiological signal fusion in emotion recognition.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Emotion recognition in cross-linguistic legal context: a comparison between human-based and computational approaches.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- A Comprehensive Review of Multimodal Emotion Recognition: Techniques, Challenges, and Future Directions.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Objective Measurement of Musculoskeletal Pain: A Comprehensive Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The widespread availability of miniaturized wearable fitness trackers has enabled the monitoring of various essential health parameters. Utilizing wearable technology for precise emotion recognition during human and computer interactions can facilitate authentic, emotionally aware contextual communication. In this paper, an emotion recognition system is proposed for the first time to conduct an experimental analysis of both discrete and dimensional models. An ensemble deep learning architecture is considered that consists of Long Short-Term Memory and Gated Recurrent Unit models to capture dynamic temporal dependencies within emotional data sequences effectively. The publicly available wearable devices EMOGNITION database is utilized to facilitate result reproducibility and comparison. The database includes physiological signals recorded using the Samsung Galaxy Watch, Empatica E4 wristband, and MUSE 2 Electroencephalogram (EEG) headband devices for a comprehensive understanding of emotions. A detailed comparison of all three dedicated wearable devices has been carried out to identify nine discrete emotions, exploring three different bio-signal combinations. The Samsung Galaxy and MUSE 2 devices achieve an average classification accuracy of 99.14% and 99.41%, respectively. The performance of the Samsung Galaxy device is examined for the 2D Valence-Arousal effective dimensional model. Results reveal average classification accuracy of 97.81% and 72.94% for Valence and Arousal dimensions, respectively. The acquired results demonstrate promising outcomes in emotion recognition when compared with the state-of-the-art methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.