ArticleBMC medical education2025
Perceived stress and academic achievement among medical students with different chronotypes: a cross sectional study on first year medical students from India.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evidence on Sleep and Academic Achievement in First-Year University Students: A Scoping Review.Clocks & sleep · 2026Review
- Chronotype, Sleep, and Attention Levels Among Undergraduate Medical Students in South India: A Cross-Sectional Study.Cureus · 2026Article
- Social jetlag and related circadian factors among medical students: A brief report of prevalence, contributing factors, and health effects.Journal of education and health promotion · 2026Article
- Effects of occupational stress on the distribution of circulating T lymphocyte subsets and psychological health of young anaesthesiologists.BMC psychology · 2025Article
- Chronotype's effect on academic achievement and absence from classrooms and clinical sessions among clinical phase medical students at the Faculty of Medicine, University of Tabuk, Saudi Arabia.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronotype, which denotes an individual's preference for morning or evening activity patterns, has been linked to variations in cognitive performance, sleep behavior, and stress levels. This study investigates the association between chronotype, perceived stress, and academic performance among first-year medical students.
methodsA cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted among 148 medical students at a private university. Chronotype was assessed using the Munich Chronotype Questionnaire (MCTQ), and perceived stress was measured using the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). Academic performance was categorized into "Excellent" (marks > 65%) and "Average" (marks < 55%). Statistical analyses included independent t-tests, chi-square tests to evaluate differences and associations.
resultsMorning chronotypes demonstrated significantly higher academic performance, with 49.1% in the "Excellent" group compared to 29% of Evening chronotypes (p =.03). Perceived stress scores were significantly higher among Evening chronotypes (24.9 ± 12.1) than Morning chronotypes (20.7 ± 9.3, p =.028). Furthermore, Evening chronotypes exhibited longer sleep latency (41.17 ± 13.35 min vs. 14.49 ± 12.14 min, p <.001) and greater variability in weekend sleep schedules (p <.001). Gender differences in stress and academic performance were minimal and not statistically significant.
conclusionChronotype significantly affects academic performance and stress levels among medical students, with Morning types performing better academically experiencing less stress. Tailored strategies like flexible scheduling and sleep hygiene promotion can help Evening chronotypes overcome challenges, improving academic outcomes and psychological well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.