Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40383771›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of retina and vitreous2025

Pioneering evaluation in Brazil of microscope-integrated optical coherence tomography with a three-dimensional digital visualization system during pars plana vitrectomy for the treatment of macular hole.

Leticia Pinheiro de Freitas, Jamil Miguel Neto, Laís Lauria Neves, Thais Bastos, Alexandre Caiado Ferreira Pires, Antônio Marcelo Barbante Casella, David Leonardo Cruvinel Isaac, Marcos Pereira de Ávila

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of retina and vitreous, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Current Topics in OCT Applications in Vitreoretinal Surgery.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Leticia Pinheiro de FreitasOphthalmology Reference Center at the Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Go, 74605-020, Brazil. pfreitas.lele@gmail.com.
Jamil Miguel NetoOphthalmology Reference Center at the Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Go, 74605-020, Brazil.
Laís Lauria NevesOphthalmology Reference Center at the Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Go, 74605-020, Brazil.
Thais BastosOphthalmology Reference Center at the Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Go, 74605-020, Brazil.
Alexandre Caiado Ferreira PiresOphthalmology Reference Center at the Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Go, 74605-020, Brazil.
Antônio Marcelo Barbante CasellaDepartment of Ophthalmology, State University of Londrina, Londrina, PR, 86057-970, Brazil.
David Leonardo Cruvinel IsaacOphthalmology Reference Center at the Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Go, 74605-020, Brazil.
Marcos Pereira de ÁvilaOphthalmology Reference Center at the Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Go, 74605-020, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to characterize the clinical results and usability of intraoperative optical coherence tomography (iOCT) associated with a digital visualization system in vitreoretinal surgery for macular hole correction.

methodsThis is a descriptive observational study of patients undergoing vitreoretinal surgery for macular hole at Brazilian Eye Surgery Center in which the digital visualization system associated with iOCT was used. Anatomical and functional results were collected 6 months after surgery. Macular hole closure rates, pre- and post-operative visual acuity were measured in addition to surgeon feedback and the percentage in which the technology allowed intraoperative decision-making.

results25 eyes of 25 patients were included in the study. The mean preoperative visual acuity was 20/100, ranging from 20/50 to less than 20/400, and postoperative visual acuity was 20/60, ranging from 20/25 to less than 20/400. The time spent with iOCT did not result in surgical delay, as the average time spent was 3.24 extra minutes spent per surgery. Closure of the macular hole was achieved successfully in 92% of cases. In 8% of them surgical success in closing the macular hole was achieved after a new fluid-gas exchange in the office. The surgeon preferred real-time iOCT and, in 4% (1/25) of cases, it influenced the change in surgical technique, preventing unnecessary ILM (Internal Limiting Membrane) peeling after complete removal of the posterior hyaloid and closing the macular hole. In all cases the surgeon reported valid feedback regarding the use of information provided by real-time OCT. This tool was valid for confirming complete ILM peeling in all cases in which it was performed. Finally, iOCT made it possible to identify the appropriate location to begin creating the ILM flap in 2 cases (8%) both of fragile retina; It prevented a new injection of dyes to identify residual ILM in 8% of cases (2/25) and allowed verification of the correct positioning of the pedicled ILM flap over the hole in 16% (4/25) of cases. Therefore, in 36% of cases (9/25) iOCT was essential for the final surgical outcome.

conclusionThis study suggests that the use of iOCT integrated with a digital viewing microscope for the treatment of macular holes offers high standard usability and effectiveness for visualizing structures, and impact favorably on decision-making process during pars-plana vitrectomy. These findings suggest that in the near future, expanded use of iOCT could significantly improve tissue management at the vitreomacular interface and improve anatomical and functional results.

Indexed as

ILM peelingiOCTMacular holeVitrectomy

Identifiers

PMID40383771
PMCPMC12087076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.