ArticleScientific reports2025
Calibration of soil contact parameters for planting sand shrubs in the desert regions of Inner Mongolia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To address the lack of accurate and reliable discrete element models for the interaction between soil particles and planting mechanisms in sandy environments, parameter calibration was carried out using sandy soil from the northwest desert region of Inner Mongolia. Through Plackett-Burman experiments, we identified key factors that significantly affect the angle of repose. The range of these significant factors was further refined using steepest ascent experiments. Subsequently, a Box-Behnken experiment was conducted to establish a regression model for these significant factors, aiming to identify the optimal combination. We validated this optimal combination through a blend of simulation and physical experiments. The results reveal that the optimal combination of significant factors, determined from the angle of repose as the response variable, includes a static friction coefficient of soil-soil at 0.442, a rolling friction coefficient of soil-soil at 0.140, and a static friction coefficient of soil-steel at 0.305. By using the opening diameter and effective depth of the drilling machine as measurement benchmarks, the relative errors for the simulation and physical experiments were recorded at 2.9% and 0.4%, respectively. These findings affirm the accuracy and reliability of the measured parameters, thereby providing a theoretical foundation for understanding the interaction mechanisms between desert planting machinery and soil.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.