ArticleDiscover oncology2025
Modelling the cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening with HPV self-sampling and molecular triage for women aged 60-69 years.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Cervical cancer screening strategies in women 65 years and older in the human papillomavirus era: A systematic review and meta-analysis of human papillomavirus-based testing and self-sampling approaches.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026Pooled it
- Cost and cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer HPV DNA self-sampling: a systematic review.BMJ public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSince 2022, self-sampling has been recommended in Sweden's cervical screening program. Despite still being used primarily for long-term non-attendees, its expected increase in use raises interest in molecular triage methods applicable to self-collected samples. Postmenopausal women face screening challenges due to physiological changes, making this group particularly relevant for evaluating alternative strategies. This study models the cost-effectiveness of different sampling and triage methods in identifying histological high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) in women aged 60-69 years.
methodsUsing real-world data, this study compares the cost-effectiveness of currently implemented strategy based on professional HPV sampling and combination triage with genotyping and cytology, with modelled strategies based on self-sampling and various molecular triage. The comparison evaluates healthcare resource use and the number of identified histological HSIL cases. The analysis focuses on a single screening cycle, re-testing of invalid samples or screening-positive/triage-negative women are not addressed.
resultsScreening with molecular triage either leads to decreases in effect, i.e. fewer histological HSIL identified, or significant cost increases due to higher rate of HPV-positive screening samples and higher number of colposcopy follow-ups.
conclusionsMolecular triage, whether used with self-sampling or professional sampling, does not appear cost-effective for identifying HSIL in this age group compared to the current screening strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.