Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40383726›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2025

Assessing the accuracy of the third molar eruption as an indicator of adulthood: findings from a black South African sample using the Gambier method.

Nikolaos Angelakopoulos, Shatakshi Sharma, Sudheer Babu Balla, Galina Zolotenkova, Stefano De Luca

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nikolaos AngelakopoulosDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. nikolaos.angelakopoulos@unibe.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8511-4645
Shatakshi SharmaIndependent Researcher, Dundee, Scotland, UK.
Sudheer Babu Balla *Dentistry and Oral Health, La Trobe Rural Health School, Bendigo, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0977-3889
Galina Zolotenkova *Department of Forensic Medicine, I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1764-2213
Stefano De Luca *Department of Biology of Organisms and Systems, Faculty of Biology, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1725-0853

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAge estimation is a critical aspect of forensic practice, often requiring straightforward, accurate, and precise dental methods employed by experts in various contexts where their expertise is needed. The third molar eruption analysis presents a practical approach. This study evaluates the Gambier et al. scoring system for assessing legal adulthood (18 years) through third molar observations in black South African subadults. MATERIALS AND

methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 877 orthopantomograms (357 males and 520 females) of individuals aged 14 to 24 years.

resultsThe mean chronological age increased with the progression of stages (1 to 3) and phases (A to D) of the third molar eruption for both sexes. Our study revealed a strong association between advanced eruption phases and the likelihood of being 18 years or older. For instance, phase D (complete emergence in the occlusal plane) showed a high likelihood of individuals being 18 years or older, with 76% of males (32 out of 42) and 80.5% of females (66 out of 82) in this phase aged above 18.

conclusionThis technique, due to its ease of use, can provide useful preliminary information regarding the probable age of alleged minor asylum seekers. However, the results indicate that, in line with the minimum age principle, this method should be applied cautiously when determining adulthood, as the minimum age for both stage 3 of eruption and phase D is clearly below 18 years. Therefore, it should always be used alongside other validated methods recommended by international protocols and good practice guidelines to ensure reliability across different populations.

Indexed as

Age Determination by TeethBlack PeopleMolar, ThirdTooth EruptionAdolescentAdultFemaleForensic DentistryHumansMaleRadiography, PanoramicRetrospective StudiesSouth AfricaYoung AdultAge of majorityDental age estimationGambier et al. scoring systemSouth AfricaThird molar eruption

Identifiers

PMID40383726
PMCPMC12354493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.