ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025
Standardized gynecologic consultation and bone surveillance in patients with breast cancer receiving hormone therapy.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comment on "Standardized gynecologic consultation and bone surveillance in patients with breast cancer receiving hormone therapy"2.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveLong-term use of hormone therapy may increase the risks of endometrial cancer and osteoporosis in patients with breast cancer. To minimize these risks, breast surgeons should schedule early consultations with gynecologists and arrange bone mineral density (BMD) examinations. In this study, we used the plan-do-study-act (PDSA) methodology to enhance comprehensive care coordination with the gynecology department and promote early surveillance of bone loss in patients with breast cancer undergoing hormone therapy.
methodsWe conducted a workshop and implemented standardized interventions that included gynecologic consultations and BMD examinations. We tracked the rates of these interventions during sequential PDSA cycles in 2023 and compared them with baseline rates from 2020 to 2022. We also evaluated the adjustment rate of therapy in patients with osteoporosis after undergoing BMD examinations.
resultsBefore our interventions were implemented, the baseline 6-month rate of gynecologic consultations was 36%. This rate increased to 76.3% and 75% during PDSA cycles 1 and 2, respectively. Similarly, the rate of BMD examinations increased from 29.3 to 40% during PDSA cycle 1. Among patients who received a diagnosis of osteoporosis after a BMD examination, the rate of those who altered their hormone therapy increased from 11% before the PDSA cycles to 19% during the cycles.
conclusionOur standardized intervention successfully raises awareness among all practitioners and promotes comprehensive care for patients with breast cancer receiving hormone therapy. Future PDSA cycles should focus on developing implementation strategies aimed at enhancing electronic medical record systems to better identify patients at risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40383715What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.