ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2026
Comparison of Nicotine and Selected Flavoring Contents Between Tobacco-Free and Tobacco-Containing Oral Pouches.
Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of nicotine concentration and pH on nicotine pouch appeal and sensory experience: A randomized experimental study.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2026Article
- Marketing of oral nicotine pouches on Malaysian social media and e-commerce websites.Tobacco induced diseases · 2026Article
- Same brand, same flavour: but not the same product?Tobacco control · 2025Article
- Awareness and use of oral nicotine pouches among youth and young adults, 2022-2024: repeat cross-sectional surveys in Canada, England, the USA and New Zealand.BMJ public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionFlavored oral tobacco-free pouches (ONPs) are novel products that resemble traditional oral tobacco-containing pouches (OTPs) in design and route of administration. However, ONPs contain nicotine, various additives, and a filler material rather than tobacco leaves. Our study compares nicotine content, release, and form, along with selected flavoring content, between brands of ONPs and OTPs.
methodsA convenience sample of flavored ONPs (n = 10 brands) and OTPs (n = 7 brands) was purchased between 2021 and 2023. Total nicotine content in the pouches, nicotine released over 1 hour, isomer ratio (R:S-nicotine), and 33 flavoring chemicals were measured using chromatography methods. Nicotine form (the proportion of nicotine in the protonated versus freebase forms) was calculated after measuring the pH.
resultsAlthough ONPs contained, on average, 50% less nicotine than OTPs (6.4 ± 3.5 vs. 12.3 ± 8.2 mg/pouch, p < .001), they released similar amounts of nicotine within 5 minutes (ONPs 6.5 ± 3.9 vs. OTPs 7.6 ± 3.9 mg/pouch, p = .422). The nicotine used in ONPs compared to OTPs was primarily freebase (63.4%±25.2% vs. 47.2%±34.4%, p = .223). Two ONPs contained racemic nicotine, suggesting their synthetic source. Menthol was the most frequently used flavoring chemical in both ONPs and OTPs. Triacetin was the most concentrated flavoring in ONPs (12.7 ± 12.7 mg/pouch) and methyl salicylate the most in OTPs (25.1 ± 1.8 mg/pouch).
conclusionsONPs have a similar nicotine release profile as OTPs but contain a high fraction of the freebase nicotine and a wide range of flavorings. The presence of freebase nicotine and flavorings in ONPs may contribute to differential abuse liability of those novel products compared to OTPs. IMPLICATIONS: This is the first non-industry study to compare nicotine content, release, form, and select flavoring composition between multiple ONPs and OTPs. These findings have implications if any future modified risk claims for ONPs are considered. Although nicotine content was significantly higher in OTPs than in ONPs, the amount of nicotine released from the pouch was very similar between ONPs and OTPs. While many flavoring chemicals present in ONPs and OTPs are generally recognized as safe for oral consumption, their potential oral health risk in ONP and OTP users has not been evaluated and therefore must be monitored and assessed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.