ArticleResuscitation2025
Neurologic etiologies of cardiac arrest are associated with early withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy.
Article in Resuscitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNeurologic etiologies of cardiac arrest are uncommon and understudied. We described the characteristics of patients who arrested from neurologic etiologies and tested the hypotheses that survival, rate of withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy for perceived poor neurologic prognosis (WLST-N), and early (≤1 day from arrest) WLST-N would differ between those who did and did not arrest from neurologic etiologies.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective study of patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest. We described the cohort who arrest from neurologic causes. We assessed survival between patients with and without neurologic arrest etiologies using multivariable logistic regression. We used Fisher's exact test to compare proportion of patients with early WLST-N by arrest etiology. We performed a time-to-event analysis and used Cox regression to test the association between arrest etiology and rate of WLST-N, censoring for death from other cause and survival at hospital discharge.
resultsWe included 4,414 patients, of whom 158 (3.6%) arrested from neurologic causes. Compared to patients to non-neurologic arrest etiologies, patients who arrested from neurologic etiologies had lower odds of survival (OR 0.39; 95% CI, 0.21-0.70) and worse functional outcomes (p < 0.001). Patients with neurologic arrest etiologies had increased hazard of WLST-N (HR 2.4; 95% CI, 1.87-3.15) and a greater proportion had early WLST-N (p < 0.001).
conclusionNeurologic etiologies of cardiac were associated with worse functional outcomes and increased in-hospital mortality. Early mortality among patients with neurologic arrest etiologies was driven by withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment for perceived poor neurologic prognosis, suggesting prognostic nihilism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.