Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40383434›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer2025

Amivantamab in Participants With Advanced NSCLC and MET Exon 14 Skipping Mutations: Final Results From the CHRYSALIS Study.

Matthew G Krebs, Byoung Chul Cho, Sandrine Hiret, Ji-Youn Han, Ki Hyeong Lee, Casilda Llácer Pérez, Filippo De Braud, Eric B Haura, Rachel E Sanborn, James Chih-Hsin Yang and 22 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. A Phase II Study of Cabozantinib in Patients WithJTO clinical and research reports · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

32 authors.

Matthew G KrebsDivision of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester and The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom. Electronic address: matthew.krebs@nhs.net.
Byoung Chul ChoDivision of Medical Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sandrine HiretMedical Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint-Herblain, France.
Ji-Youn HanNational Cancer Center, Goyang-si, Republic of Korea.
Ki Hyeong LeeChungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Republic of Korea.
Casilda Llácer PérezMedical Oncology Intercenter Unit, Regional and Virgen de la Victoria University Hospitals, IBIsnowMA, Málaga, Spain.
Filippo De BraudDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Eric B HauraH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida.
Rachel E SanbornEarle A. Chiles Research Institute, Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, Oregon.
James Chih-Hsin YangNational Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan.
Catherine A ShuColumbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.
Koichi GotoNational Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Makoto NishioCancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Jun ZhaoKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Thoracic Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Zhijie WangState Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, CAMS Key Laboratory of Translational Research on Lung Cancer, Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Pascale TomasiniAix Marseille University - CNRS, INSERM, CRCM; CEPCM - AP-HM Hopital de La Timone, Marseille, France.
Enriqueta FelipMedical Oncology Service, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Jonathan W GoldmanDavid Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Sai-Hong Ignatius OuUniversity of California Irvine School of Medicine, Orange, California.
Michael BoyerChris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
Grace GaoJohnson & Johnson, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Siyang QuJohnson & Johnson, Spring House, Pennsylvania.
Joshua C CurtinJohnson & Johnson, Raritan, New Jersey.
Xuesong LyuJohnson & Johnson, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Robert W SchneppJohnson & Johnson, Spring House, Pennsylvania.
Priya KimJohnson & Johnson, Spring House, Pennsylvania.
Meena ThayuJohnson & Johnson, Spring House, Pennsylvania.
Roland E KnoblauchJohnson & Johnson, Spring House, Pennsylvania.
Patricia LorenziniJohnson & Johnson, Spring House, Pennsylvania.
Mahadi BaigJohnson & Johnson, Raritan, New Jersey.
Alexander I SpiraVirginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, Virginia.
Natasha B LeighlPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAmivantamab is an EGFR-MET bispecific antibody with immune cell-directing activity. We assessed the safety and efficacy of amivantamab in participants with advanced NSCLC harboring primary MET exon 14 skipping mutations (METex14).

methodsCHRYSALIS enrolled participants with METex14 NSCLC who progressed after or declined standard-of-care therapy. Participants received intravenous amivantamab weekly for 4 weeks and biweekly thereafter. Objective response rate, duration of response (DoR), clinical benefit rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, safety, and circulating tumor DNA were analyzed.

resultsAmong 97 participants, 16 were treatment naive, 28 received prior treatment without MET therapies, and 53 received prior MET therapies. Objective response rate was 32% overall, 50% in treatment-naive participants, 46% in participants without prior MET therapies, and 19% in participants with prior MET therapies. In participants without prior MET therapies, amivantamab activity was observed regardless of co-occurring genomic alterations. Clinical benefit rate was 69% overall, 88% in treatment-naive participants, 64% in participants without prior MET therapies, and 66% in participants with prior MET therapies. Median DoR was 11.2 months; 61% (19/31) of the responders had DoR greater than or equal to 6 months. Median progression-free survival was 5.3 months (95% confidence interval, 4.3-7.0); median overall survival was 15.8 months (95% confidence interval, 14.6-not estimable). Most common adverse events were rash (79%) and infusion-related reactions (72%), most being grades 1 to 2 (52%).

conclusionsThe safety profile was consistent with previous reports of amivantamab in EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Amivantamab demonstrated clinically meaningful and durable antitumor activity in participants with METex14 advanced NSCLC, including those who progressed on prior MET therapies.

Indexed as

Antibodies, BispecificCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsMutationProto-Oncogene Proteins c-metAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalExonsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurvival RateamivantamabAntibodies, BispecificAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalMET protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins c-metAdvanced non–small cell lung cancerAmivantamabCHRYSALISMET exon 14 skipping mutationPrevious MET therapies

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.