Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40383194›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2025

Pembrolizumab plus enzalutamide and androgen deprivation therapy versus placebo plus enzalutamide and androgen deprivation therapy for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: the randomized, double-blind, phase III KEYNOTE-991 study.

C Gratzke, M Özgüroğlu, A Peer, M A N Sendur, M Retz, J C Goh, W Loidl, G Jayram, S-S Byun, C Kwak and 10 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Emerging Therapeutic Strategies in Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer.Journal of immunotherapy and precision oncology · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Immunotherapy in metastatic prostate cancer.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2025
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Androgen Deprivation Therapy Drives a Distinct Immune Phenotype in Localized Prostate Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

C GratzkeDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. Electronic address: christian.gratzke@uniklinik-freiburg.de.
M ÖzgüroğluDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
A PeerDepartment of Oncology, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel.
M A N SendurDepartment of Medical Oncology, Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University Faculty of Medicine and Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
M RetzDepartment of Urology, Rechts der Isar Medical Center, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
J C GohGallipoli Medical Research-Greenslopes Private Hospital, Greenslopes, Australia.
W LoidlDepartment of Urology and Andrology, Ordensklinikum Linz GmbH Elisabethinen, Linz, Austria.
G JayramUrology Associates P.C., Nashville, USA.
S-S ByunDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam.
C KwakDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
M KwiatkowskiOddział Dzienny Chemioterapii, Szpital Wojewódzki im. Mikołaja Kopernika, Koszalin, Poland.
R Manneh KoppSociedad de Oncología y Hematología del Cesar S.A.S., Valledupar, Colombia.
J C V LimónHospital Civil de Guadalajara "Fray Antonio Alcalde", Guadalajara, Mexico; Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Mexico.
J F E PenagosHospital San Lucas Cardiología del Sureste, Tuxtla Gutiérrez, México.
U De GiorgiIRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) Dino Amadori, Meldola, Italy.
K M da TrindadeInstituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino, Brazil and Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Brazil.
C NiuMSD China, Beijing, China.
Y LiuMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, USA.
C H PoehleinMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, USA.
J M PiulatsInstituto Catalan de Oncologia-IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite treatment advances, most patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) experience disease progression to castration-resistant disease within 5 years. The placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase III KEYNOTE-991 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of adding pembrolizumab to enzalutamide and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in participants with mHSPC. PATIENTS AND

methodsEligible participants were aged ≥18 years with next-generation hormonal agent-naive mHSPC. Participants were randomly assigned (1 : 1) to receive intravenous pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo every 3 weeks for ≤35 cycles, with oral enzalutamide 160 mg and continuous ADT. Primary endpoints were radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) and overall survival (OS). Safety was a secondary endpoint.

resultsBetween 2 March 2020 and 9 August 2021, 626 participants were randomly assigned to receive pembrolizumab plus enzalutamide and ADT and 625 participants to receive placebo plus enzalutamide and ADT. At the first interim analysis, the median follow-up was 21.1 months (range 14.8-32.0 months). rPFS was not superior with pembrolizumab versus placebo [median not reached in both arms; hazard ratio (HR) 1.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.96-1.49, P = 0.9467]. Median OS was not reached in either arm (HR 1.16, 95% CI 0.88-1.53; not formally statistically tested as per the multiplicity strategy). Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs) were reported in 61.9% versus 38.1% and 40.3% versus 23.2% of participants in the pembrolizumab versus the placebo arm, respectively. Any-grade rash occurred at a higher frequency with pembrolizumab (25.1%) versus placebo (9.3%).

conclusionsKEYNOTE-991 did not meet its primary endpoint and was stopped for futility. The addition of pembrolizumab to enzalutamide and ADT was associated with higher frequencies of grade ≥3 AEs and SAEs than with placebo. Rash was identified as an additional safety signal with pembrolizumab plus enzalutamide and ADT.

Indexed as

Androgen AntagonistsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsPhenylthiohydantoinProstatic NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overBenzamidesDouble-Blind MethodHumansMaleMiddle AgedNitrilesAndrogen AntagonistsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBenzamidesenzalutamideNitrilespembrolizumabPhenylthiohydantoinandrogen deprivation therapycombination therapymetastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancerPD-1 inhibitorpembrolizumab

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.