Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40383116›Full record

SynthesisCardiorenal medicine2025

Kidney Recovery after Acute Kidney Injury: A Comprehensive Review.

Mehrbod Vakhshoori, Amir Abdipour, Jasjot Bhullar, Melin Narayan, Sergio Infante, Sayna Norouzi, Roy O Mathew

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cardiorenal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mehrbod VakhshooriDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, California, USA, mvakhshoori@llu.edu.
Amir AbdipourDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, California, USA.
Jasjot BhullarDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, California, USA.
Melin NarayanDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, California, USA.
Sergio InfanteDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, California, USA.
Sayna NorouziDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, California, USA.
Roy O MathewDepartment of Medicine, Loma Linda VA Health Care System, Loma Linda, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute Kidney Injury (AKI) is a common and critical condition associated with significant morbidity and mortality across various patient populations. The recovery process following AKI is complex and involves a multitude of biological, clinical, and environmental factors. Despite considerable research, there remains substantial debate regarding the exact role and significance of these factors, as well as how they interact with one another. SUMMARY: This systematic review aims to examine the currently available evidence on the key factors influencing AKI recovery. We hope to offer a clearer understanding of the complex dynamics in AKI recovery, including where current evidence remains inconclusive or contradictory. KEY MESSAGES: This review will provide valuable insights for clinicians and researchers aiming to improve treatment strategies and patient outcomes in AKI recovery.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryKidneyRecovery of FunctionHumansAcute kidney injuryKidney function recoveryOutcomes

Identifiers

PMID40383116
PMCPMC12185056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.