Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40382915›Full record

SynthesisInternational dental journal2025

Can Large Language Models Serve as Reliable Tools for Information in Dentistry? A Systematic Review.

Nora Alhazmi, Aram Alshehri, Fahad BaHammam, Manju Philip, Muhammad Nadeem, Sanjeev Khanagar

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International dental journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nora AlhazmiDepartment of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Ministry of the National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Electronic address: alhazmino@ksau-hs.edu.sa.
Aram AlshehriDepartment of Restorative and Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Ministry of the National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Fahad BaHammamDepartment of Restorative and Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Ministry of the National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Manju PhilipDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery and Diagnostic Sciences, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Ministry of the National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Muhammad NadeemCollege of Dentistry, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Ministry of the National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Sanjeev KhanagarDepartment of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Ministry of the National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have gained popularity among dental students for generating subject-related answers. However, their widespread use raises significant concerns about misinformation. This systematic review aims to critically evaluate studies assessing the performance of LLMs in dentistry. A comprehensive electronic search was conducted in PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and the Saudi Digital Library to identify studies published up to September 2024. The study quality was assessed using the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST). A total of 2030 studies have been identified. After removing 907 duplicate records, 1123 studies remained for screening. Ultimately, 31 studies met the inclusion criteria. Approximately half of these studies were classified as "high risk," while the remainder were classified as "low risk." The applicability of the findings was rated as "low concern." The primary limitations of LLMs include their inability to specify information sources and their tendency to generate fabricated citations. Based on this review, LLMs hold promise as supplementary educational tools in dentistry. Evidence indicates that students using LLMs may achieve improved academic performance compared to traditional methods. However, concerns about occasional inaccuracies and unreliable citations underscore the need for further research, integration with validated sources, and adherence to ethical guidelines. Ultimately, LLMs should be viewed as complementary tools within dental education, with careful consideration of their limitations.

Indexed as

DentistryEducation, DentalLanguageHumansLarge Language ModelsStudents, DentalAccuracyDentistryLarge language modelsPerformance

Identifiers

PMID40382915
PMCPMC12146530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.