ArticleBreast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)2025
Prognostic impact of ER-staining patterns and heterogeneity of ER positive HER2 negative breast cancer.
Article in Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEstrogen receptor (ER) expression is critical in breast cancer treatment. While low ER (1-9%) resembles triple-negative cancer with chemotherapy efficacy, the significance of "intermediate expression" (≥ 10%) and the therapeutic efficacy remain unclear. This study explores the differences in staining patterns and molecular characteristics of ER-low to intermediate expression to guide treatment.
methodsA total of 104 breast cancer patients treated between January 2008 and July 2024 with an Allred Proportion Score (PS) of 2-4 were included. PS2 (n = 21) was classified as ER-low, while PS3 (n = 26) and PS4 (n = 57) as ER-intermediate (ER-int). ER-int was further divided by ER staining pattern: "Island" (heterogeneous) and "Scatter," (uniform) subgroups. The prognosis, clinical factors, and gene expression profiles (n = 11) were analyzed.
resultsThe Island subgroup was associated with poorest prognosis (p = 0.0116), particularly among the patients treated with endocrine-only treatment patients (p < 0.0001). Elevated tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) levels correlated with worse prognosis in endocrine-only treatment patients (p < 0.0043), with TIL levels highest in ER-low, followed by Island and Scatter subgroups. Island tumors were enriched in CD36, GZMB, and type I interferon genes; additionally, 23 "ISLAND" genes showed significant prognostic differences in the TCGA BRCA ER-int (10-69%) cohort.
conclusionThis study emphasizes the importance of recognizing heterogeneity within the ER-int subtype. Identifying distinct ER staining patterns and prognostic significance of TILs and transcriptome in ER-int tumors suggests the need for individualized treatment strategies for Island subtype.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.