ArticleDiscover oncology2025
Development and validation of a multiple myeloma diagnostic model based on systemic lupus erythematosus-associated genes and identification of specific genes.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMonoclonal immunoglobulins are commonly found in multiple myeloma (MM), a prevalent hematologic malignancy that is currently incurable. In recent years, the association between systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), an autoimmune disease, and MM has garnered increasing attention. However, there remains a lack of in-depth research regarding the interactions between these two conditions and their potential pathogenic mechanisms. Therefore, in order to improve the identification of MM associated with SLE, this work attempts to clarify the pathogenic pathways that are shared by MM and SLE and to develop corresponding diagnostic models.
methodsThis study employs a comprehensive bioinformatics analysis combined with machine learning techniques to extract relevant data from public databases. We used GO and KEGG pathway analyses to investigate the functionalities and pathway enrichments of the DEGs that we found in MM and SLE populations. Furthermore, we used the STRING database to build a PPI network for the intersecting genes and the cytoHubba plugin in Cytoscape software to identify important genes with biological significance. To establish a diagnostic model for SLE-related MM, we compared 113 combinations of 12 machine learning algorithms, ultimately determining the optimal model.
resultsOur analysis identified 63 intersecting genes, with 31 exhibiting upregulated expression and 32 showing downregulated expression. The selection of key genes indicated that nine genes met the criteria of having both Degree and MCC values exceeding 3, among which seven (CDH1, IL4, AURKB, HGF, H2BC9, AREG, TJP1) have previously been confirmed to have direct associations with MM. Notably, H2BC5 was identified as a specific gene associated with SLE-related MM. Our findings revealed that elevated expression of H2BC5 is significantly correlated with an increased risk of MM, suggesting its potential critical role in the diagnosis and identification of this malignancy.
conclusionA new molecular framework for the early diagnosis of MM, especially in SLE patients, is established by this study. Our findings highlight H2BC5 as a possible biomarker that merits more research into how it contributes to the development of MM. By identifying the shared pathogenic mechanisms between SLE and MM, our research offers new perspectives for future clinical interventions and personalized therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.