ArticleJMIR research protocols2025
Acceptability of the Expert Standard for Oral Health Care in Older Adult Patients Among Nursing Staff in German Hospitals and Care Facilities: Protocol for a Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in JMIR research protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aging population and increasing prevalence of natural teeth among older adults have escalated the demand for oral health care, especially in nursing settings. Impaired oral health in older individuals is closely linked to systemic conditions such as diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. The expert standard "promoting oral health in nursing" was developed in Germany to enhance the quality of oral care and address future challenges in geriatric nursing. It comprises a series of recommended interventions targeting oral health promotion in nursing care. However, significant barriers, including high patient-to-nurse ratios and staff shortages, often result in missed or rationed nursing care, limiting the feasibility and implementation of such interventions. Evaluating the acceptability of this standard is critical to its successful integration into routine nursing practice.
objectiveWe aim to assess the acceptability of the expert standard among nursing staff providing care for older individuals, identify factors influencing its adoption, and examine the relationship between nursing competence, care rationed or missed (CROM), and the standard's acceptability.
methodsThis quantitative cross-sectional study will collect data from nursing staff in 25 hospitals and long-term care facilities in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany, using standardized survey instruments. Based on the template of the generic theoretical framework of acceptability, a questionnaire to measure the acceptability of interventions across 7 domains was created. Oral health knowledge will be assessed using the Oral Health Literacy Profile and competence in mouth care using the questionnaire developed by the DNQP (Deutsches Netzwerk für Qualitätsentwicklung in der Pflege [German network for Quality Development in Nursing]). Barriers to implementation will be evaluated according to the acute care nurses' questionnaire on oral hygiene and CROM using the oral care-related question from the Basel Extent of Rationing of Nursing Care instrument. Statistical analyses consist of first calculating the mean acceptability with a 95% CI for each recommended intervention of the expert standard. Second, repeated measures ANOVA is used to examine mean differences in acceptability between these interventions. Third, linear regression analyses are used to test the impact of nursing competence on acceptability and lastly chi-square tests of independence are used to compare CROM with already published rates in German-speaking countries.
resultsThe results are anticipated to provide insights into the acceptability of the expert standard and its determinants, including nursing competence and perceived barriers. Data collection will commence in June 2025 and is expected to be completed by October 2025.
conclusionsThis study evaluates the acceptability of the expert standard for oral health in nursing. The findings will support evidence-based strategies to enhance feasibility, reduce CROM prevalence, and improve oral health in older adults. By focusing on acceptability as a prerequisite for implementation, this study emphasizes the need to align interventions with the realities of nursing care to achieve effective outcomes. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/72528.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.