ArticlePlant & cell physiology2026
Three Orobanche genomes reveal distinct molecular repertoires in species with different host ranges.
Article in Plant & cell physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genomes of Conopholis americana and Epifagus virginiana: two holoparasitic plants (Orobanchaceae).G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Progress and prospects of parasitic plant biodiversity genomics.Plant & cell physiology · 2026Review
- Strigolactones and sesquiterpene lactones induce Orobanche cumana germination via KAI2d receptors through distinct processes.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2026Article
- In vitro dynamic and quantitative monitoring of strigolactone-signaling complex formation by time-resolved FRET.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Parasitic plants in the genus Orobanche display varying levels of host specificity, however, the molecular features determining host range are not fully understood. We sequenced the genomes of three Orobanche species with different host ranges: Orobanche minor (generalist), O. gracilis (Fabaceae-specific), and O. hederae (ivy-specific). Comparative analysis revealed considerable genome size variation but consistent holoparasitic gene loss patterns. While synteny analysis revealed strong collinearity between O. gracilis, O. hederae, and O. minor, we found distinct molecular repertoires among species. O. gracilis showed expanded protein-degrading and carbohydrate-active enzyme families, while putative strigolactone receptor (KAI2d) numbers varied from five in specialists to eleven in the generalist O. minor, suggesting diverse molecular strategies across different host ranges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.