ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025
Long-term clinical comparison of three different femoral stems in Total Hip Arthroplasty with femoral shortening in patients with high-riding hips.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- 'THA for DDH: replacement principles and techniques - femoral side'.EFORT open reviews · 2026Review
- Outcomes at 1 Year After Total Hip Arthroplasty Combined With Low Femoral Neck Osteotomy vs Subtrochanteric Osteotomy in 73 Patients With Crowe Type IV Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: A Retrospective Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDevelopmental hip dysplasia is a common cause of hip arthrosis in young adults, necessitating total hip arthroplasty (THA) for improved function and pain relief. In cases of high-riding hips, transverse femoral shortening osteotomy is often required to facilitate reduction and prevent neurovascular complications. However, the choice of femoral stem in such cases remains controversial due to variations in design and osteoconductive properties. This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of three different femoral stems used in THA with transverse femoral shortening osteotomy.
methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted on 107 patients who underwent THA with transverse femoral shortening osteotomy between 2004 and 2014. Patients were divided into three groups based on the femoral stem used: Group 1 (Summit Tapered Stem (Depuy
resultsThe mean preoperative HHS significantly improved from 42.7 ± 6.7 to 84.6 ± 11.5 postoperatively (p < 0.001). Group 3 had significantly higher final HHS compared to Group 1 (p = 0.0002), while no significant differences were observed between Group 1 and Group 2 (p = 0.1947) or Group 2 and Group 3 (p = 0.0723). The overall 10-year survival rate was 87.8%, with Group 3 demonstrating the highest survivorship (91%) and Group 2 the lowest (83%). Intraoperative femoral fissure or fracture rates were significantly higher in Group 1 compared to Group 3 (p = 0.0006), and with a significantly increased need for additional plating in Group 1 (p = 0.0031).
conclusionsThis study suggests that cylindrical fully porous-coated femoral stems (Wagner Cone Prosthesis) provide better clinical outcomes, fewer intraoperative complications, and higher long-term survival rates compared to tapered and rectangular stems in THA with femoral shortening osteotomy. These findings highlight the importance of implant selection in optimizing patient outcomes. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.