ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2025
Rétrograde venous perfusion (RVP) for intraçtable venous leg ulcers: a retrospective analysis.
Article in European journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRetrograde venous perfusion (RVP) is a minimally invasive procedure in which the limb circulation is isolated by the application of a proximal limb tourniquet, followed by the administration of specific medications through a distal limb vein. This allows these drugs to pass in the reverse direction to reach the ulcerated area of the affected limb. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of RVP, for the management of long-standing intractable chronic venous leg ulcers (CVLUs).
methodsA 4-year retrospective study took place from January 2021 to January 2025. All patients who underwent the RVP technique were included in the study. These patients had chronic, intractable, long-standing, nonhealing, venous leg ulcers. They were classified into two groups. Group I included those who underwent RVP (treated group). However, group II was treated with standard compression therapy (control group). A paired-samples t test was performed to compare the studied groups. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed for patients who were free from ulcer recurrence or nonhealing after the RVP technique.
resultsDuring the 4-year study period, 384 patients were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 75% (n = 288) of the participants were females, and 25% were males (n = 96). The median age was 37.26 ± 4.2 years. Ulcers ranged between 30cm
conclusionsCompared with the standard compression technique, RVP therapy may be considered an effective and feasible technique for treating intractable venous leg ulcers. It offers shorter periods of therapy with a high success rate in reducing ulcer size/complete wound healing within a short period of time. This therapeutic option may provide essential evidence to reduce the negative social and economic impact on affected populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.