ArticleBMC psychology2025
S&T innovators' sense of work gain: scale development and validation.
Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEnhancing the sense of work gain serves as a crucial approach to invigorating S&T innovators. However, there is currently a lack of specialised instruments for measuring S&T innovators' sense of work gain (STISWG), thus limiting the progress of empirical research in this field. Consequently, this study aims to develop and validate the STISWG scale based on the Existence, Relatedness and Growth theory to address this issue.
methodsThe development and validation of the STISWG scale spanned four stages and cumulatively used valid questionnaire data from 1,597 S&T innovators. The analysis methods encompassed item analysis, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), reliability analysis, and assessment of the external predictive validity by using the Employee Innovative Behaviour Scale and the Paternalistic Leadership Scale.
resultsThe STISWG scale and three subscales had satisfactory reliability across all stages. EFA indicated that the 11-item STISWG scale comprised three dimensions: existence gain, relatedness gain and growth gain. CFA confirmed that the three-factor structure of the STISWG scale was the most optimal. The results of the predictive validity revealed that all three dimensions of the STISWG were good predictors of innovative behaviour. Three dimensions of paternalistic leadership moderated the above relationships, with authoritarian leadership weakening them and benevolent and moral leadership strengthening them.
conclusionsThis study provides an effective and specialised instrument for assessing S&T innovators' sense of work gain. Moreover, it offers practical implications for enhancing the sense of work gain and innovative behaviours of S&T innovators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.