ArticleDiabetology & metabolic syndrome2025
T2D-LVDD: neural network-based predictive models for left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in type 2 diabetes.
Article in Diabetology & metabolic syndrome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Explainable Lightweight AI for the Identification of Right-Sided Cardiac Dysfunction in a Saudi Arabian Diabetic Cohort.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease complications are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with Type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) is one of the earliest myocardial characteristics of diabetic cardiac dysfunction. Therefore, we aimed to develop an LVDD-risk predictive model to diagnose cardiac dysfunction before severe cardiovascular complications arise. We trained an artificial neural network model to predict LVDD risk with patients' clinical information. The model showed better performance than classical machine learning methods such as logistic regression, random forest and support vector machine. We further explored LVDD-risk/protective features with interpretability methods in neural network. Finally, we provided a freely accessible web server called LVDD-risk, where users can submit their clinical information to obtain their LVDD-risk probability and the most noteworthy risk indicators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.