ReviewCardiovascular ultrasound2025
Echocardiographic imaging in patients with conduction system pacing.
Review in Cardiovascular ultrasound, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Clinical and electrical outcomes of conduction system pacing versus right ventricular pacing in atrioventricular block: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Pooled it
- Advanced Cardiac Imaging for Risk Prediction of Pacing-Induced Cardiomyopathy: A Narrative Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Left ventricular functional outcomes in His vs. left bundle branch area pacing: Is lead distance important in LBBAP implantation?BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conduction system pacing (CSP), encompassing His-bundle pacing (HBP) and left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP), revolutionizes cardiac pacing, allowing a more physiological left ventricular activation than conventional right ventricular (RV) pacing through electrode placed in RV apex, interventricular septum or right ventricular outflow tract. Echocardiography plays a pivotal role in patient assessment, primarily by measuring left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) to determine the pacing strategy in alignment with current guidelines. Clinical data, simulations and ongoing trials on CSP explore CSP viability across various LVEF conditions. CSP is supposed to defer pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PiCM) associated with conventional right ventricular pacing (RVP). This paper aims to review the current literature regarding the use of echocardiography in CSP. Images from our experience in the echocardiographic lab were used throughout this document to show our proposals of imaging in CSP. Echocardiography may help to determine lead localization within the interventricular septum (IVS), customizing pacing to individual anatomy and electromechanical indices (like atro-ventricular delay) and evaluates often-overlooked valvular function, a potential PiCM contributor. Three-dimensional (3-D) echocardiography widens the knowledge of lead localization and valvular dysfunction, as well as dyssynchrony assessment. Dyssynchrony, crucial both to resynchronization per se and physiological stimulation is quantified via echocardiography, especially using speckle-tracking imaging. Baseline LVEF and follow-up observation of CSP effects: early in Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS), afterwards in LV volumes and LVEF may improve the future proper qualification of patients. Limited left atrial (LA) and right atrial (RA) strain assessments hold potential in the CSP qualification and response assessment context. Echocardiography complements other imaging modalities for comprehensive patient evaluation. Echocardiography is integral in the CSP clinical use, from patient selection (by showing subtle changes in myocardial function) to post-procedure follow-up (tricuspid regurgitation, LV and RV function, leads and synchrony assessment). GLS, assessed by speckle tracking imaging and profound 2D and 3D (lead placement, septum morphology and global heart function under CSP) analyses show promise in CSP outcome assessment, though standardization is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.