Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40382633›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2025

RP-DETR: end-to-end rice pests detection using a transformer.

Jinsheng Wang, Tao Wang, Qin Xu, Lu Gao, Guosong Gu, Liangquan Jia, Chong Yao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jinsheng Wang *School of Information Engineering, Huzhou University, Huzhou, 313000, China.
Tao Wang *School of Information Engineering, Huzhou University, Huzhou, 313000, China.
Qin XuSchool of Information Engineering, Huzhou University, Huzhou, 313000, China.
Lu GaoSchool of Information Engineering, Huzhou University, Huzhou, 313000, China.
Guosong GuSchool of Information Science and Engineering, Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, 314001, China. ggs0110@zjxu.edu.cn.
Liangquan JiaSchool of Information Engineering, Huzhou University, Huzhou, 313000, China. 02426@zjhu.edu.cn.
Chong YaoHuzhou Central Hospital, Huzhou, 313000, China. ycu@hzhospital.com.

Funding

Huzhou Science and Technology Program Public Welfare Project 2021GZ23Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province Public Welfare Project LTGN23C130002Postgraduate Research and Innovation Project of Huzhou University No.2024KYCX47
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pest infestations in rice crops greatly affect yield and quality, making early detection essential. As most rice pests affect leaves and rhizomes, visual inspection of rice for pests is becoming increasingly important. In precision agriculture, fast and accurate automatic pest identification is essential. To tackle this issue, multiple models utilizing computer vision and deep learning have been applied. Owing to its high efficiency, deep learning is now the favored approach for detecting plant pests. In this regard, the paper introduces an effective rice pest detection framework utilizing the Transformer architecture, designed to capture long-range features. The paper enhances the original model by adding the self-developed RepPConv-block to reduce the problem of information redundancy in feature extraction in the model backbone and to a certain extent reduce the model parameters. The original model's CCFM structure is enhanced by integrating the Gold-YOLO neck, improving its ability to fuse multi-scale features. Additionally, the MPDIoU-based loss function enhances the model's detection performance. Using the self-constructed high-quality rice pest dataset, the model achieves higher identification accuracy while reducing the number of parameters. The proposed RP18-DETR and RP34-DETR models reduce parameters by 16.5% and 25.8%, respectively, compared to the original RT18-DETR and RT34-DETR models. With a threshold of 0.5, the average accuracy calculated is 1.2% higher for RP18-DETR than for RT18-DETR.

Indexed as

Deep learningRepPConv-blockRice pest

Identifiers

PMID40382633
PMCPMC12084966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.