Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40382626›Full record

Observational studyBMC oral health2025

Are technological contributions in behavior guidance techniques superior to conventional methods?: Effects on dental anxiety and pain perception.

Mücella Yazar, Sema Aydınoğlu, Dilara Nil Günaçar

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06912789 (Are Technological Contributions in Behavior Guidance Techniques Superior to Conventional Methods?), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06912789 completednot on this map

Are Technological Contributions in Behavior Guidance Techniques Superior to Conventional Methods? : Effects on Dental Anxiety and Pain Perception in Pulpotomy Treatment

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorRecep Tayyip Erdogan University Training and Research HospitalRan2024 to 2025Enrolled63ConditionsBehavior, Child, Dental Anxiety, Mobile Applications
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mücella YazarDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Rize, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-8024-3190
Sema AydınoğluDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Rize, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1490-8645
Dilara Nil GünaçarDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Rize, Türkiye. dilaranil.tomrukcu@erdogan.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9607-6362

Funding

Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University Development Foundation 02024012009210
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo evaluate the effects of three different behavior guidance methods on children's dental anxiety levels and pain perception.

methodsThis study included 63 children aged 6-8 years who required pulpotomy and were divided into three groups: tell-show-do (TSD; Group 1), TSD with video modeling (Group 2), and TSD with mobile phone application (Group 3). Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), heart rate (HR), and hemoglobin oxygen saturation (SPO

resultsNo significant difference was found between the steps in terms of BP, HR, and SPO

conclusionDental anxiety and pain perception scores were lowest when using TSD with mobile phone application (Group 3). In line with developing technology, the use of mobile phone applications in pediatric dentistry can contribute to more harmonious treatment management in children.

trial registrationThe trial protocol was retrospectively registered ID NCT06912789 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ ); 2025-03-26.

Indexed as

Dental AnxietyPain PerceptionBlood PressureChildFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleMobile ApplicationsPain MeasurementPulpotomyBehaviorChildDental anxietyMobile applicationsPainVital signs

Identifiers

PMID40382626
PMCPMC12085851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.