ArticleBMC medical education2025
Practical research on the cultivation of inter-disciplinary undergraduate nursing talents in the context of "big health".
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Construction of a nursing internship system through institutional collaboration: current status, challenges, and optimization pathways.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Developing evaluation index system for "new medicine" construction in Chinese medical schools-meta-ethnography and Delphi-AHP approach.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveExploring the construction and effectiveness of a inter-disciplinary undergraduate nursing talent cultivation model in the context of"great health".
methodsAdopting cluster sampling method, undergraduate nursing students enrolled in 2019 and 2020 were selected as the research subjects. The students who entered the school in 2019 were selected as the control group, who was cultivated according to"applied talent"cultivation model, Correspondingly, the students who entered the school in 2020 were selected as the experimental group, who was cultivated according to"inter-disciplinary talent"cultivation model. The practical effects of the two cultivation models were evaluated by stages: investigating students' innovation ability and scientific and technological readiness before clinical intership; investigating the satisfaction of the employer, service recipients, and clinical teacher with the students at the end of the clinical internship; Counting the total credits and average grades of compulsory courses for students at graduation.
resultsThe innovation ability score and scientific and technology readiness score of the experimental group students were higher than those of the control group students before the internship; At the end of the clinical internship, the satisfaction scores of the employer, service recipients, and clinical teacher of the experimental group students were higher than those of the control group students; At graduation, the total credits and average scores of compulsory courses of the experimental group students were higher than those of the control group students, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05).
conclusionThe "inter-disciplinary talent" cultivation model is conducive to improving students' innovation ability、scientific and technological readiness、social satisfaction, and academic performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.