ArticleBMC medical education2025
How to achieve the long-term goals of EUS training--survey on the performance of diagnostic EUS by newly trained endosonographers and analysis of the influencing factors.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study endeavors to evaluate the integration of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) by trainees upon their return to the hospital and discern the influencing factors.
methodsA questionnaire survey was administered to trainees who completed EUS training at the Department of Gastroenterology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital from October 2016 to April 2022. The impact of various factors, including trainees' characteristics, working conditions, and EUS procedure numbers during training was analyzed.
results65 valid questionnaires were categorized into two groups based on the median number of EUS procedures performed by trainees within one year post-training: a group with fewer EUS cases (< 30 cases) and a group with more EUS cases (≥ 30 cases). Significant differences were found in annual EUS procedures (P < 0.001), endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) cases (P < 0.001), and complete scan rates (P = 0.007). Favorable conditions for trainees in performing EUS included higher-level hospitals (P = 0.001), more hospital beds (P = 0.015) and department beds (P = 0.033), greater annual endoscopy volume (P < 0.001), a longer prior duration of the use of EUS on the hospital (P = 0.003), higher departmental EUS volume (P < 0.001) and presence of established staff endosonographers (P < 0.001). Additionally, trainees in the group with more EUS cases had more guidance from experienced colleagues (P = 0.009). Multivariate logistic regression analysis highlighted annual endoscopy volume and EUS volume as independent influencing factors.
conclusionTertiary hospitals with larger bed capacities and high endoscopy volumes foster optimal EUS skill development among trainees. Moreover, factors such as longer duration of EUS implementation, increased caseload and guidance from experienced colleagues all contribute to the professional growth of trainees. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.